H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kaia Kanepi vs Sybille Bammer H2H: 3-0

Kaia Kanepi holds a 3–0 lead over Sybille Bammer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kaia Kanepi leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kaia Kanepi won the 2010 Canadian Open second round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kaia Kanepi
Estonia Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
3 – 0
3 main-draw meetings
Sybille Bammer
AUT Age 46 Left-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kaia Kanepi #34 7-5 6-2 Sybille Bammer #80 Match data Aug 19, 2010* R32 Canadian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Kaia Kanepi #19 7-5 6-3 Sybille Bammer #27 Match data May 6, 2009* R32 Italian Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay
Kaia Kanepi #174 7-5 6-3 Sybille Bammer #95 Match data Sep 24, 2005* QF Kolkata Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kaia Kanepi #1,322 #15 2,760 1,908 264 236 52.8% 0 0 0 2 2 4
Sybille Bammer #161 #19 2,014 1,846 133 140 48.7% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kaia Kanepi Sybille Bammer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 0–1 0.0% #229 1,484 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,527 0 0 2000 0–1 0.0% #294 1,487 0 0
21 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,606 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,581 0 0 — — — — — — —
23 2008 30–21 58.8% #27 1,761 0 0 2003 0–2 0.0% #148 1,474 0 0
24 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,603 0 0 2004 0–4 0.0% #175 1,441 0 0
25 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,842 0 1 2005 5–7 41.7% #77 1,491 0 0
26 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,798 0 1 2006 19–26 42.2% #49 1,567 0 0
27 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,861 0 3 2007 43–24 64.2% #19 1,781 0 1
28 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,838 0 4 2008 27–25 51.9% #26 1,717 0 1
29 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,719 0 4 2009 21–23 47.7% #54 1,671 0 2
30 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,659 0 4 2010 15–19 44.1% #68 1,648 0 2
31 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,663 0 4 2011 3–9 25.0% #161 1,570 0 2
32 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,731 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2018 12–12 50.0% #61 1,776 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2019 9–9 50.0% #101 1,761 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,729 0 4 — — — — — — —
36 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,699 0 4 — — — — — — —
37 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,802 0 4 — — — — — — —
38 2023 6–15 28.6% #168 1,627 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kaia Kanepi Sybille Bammer
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2001 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 8 8 16 50.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 4 6 10 40.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 19 12 31 61.3% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
24 2009 9 13 22 40.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 15 12 27 55.6% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2005 5 6 11 45.5% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 2011 14 9 23 60.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2006 14 20 34 41.2% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
27 2012 13 6 19 68.4% 12 3 15 80.0% — — — — — — — — 2007 29 16 45 64.4% 11 6 17 64.7% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
28 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2008 22 18 40 55.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
29 2014 12 12 24 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 11 15 26 42.3% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
30 2015 7 8 15 46.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 11 12 23 47.8% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 2016 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2017 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 9 6 15 60.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 10 8 18 55.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 18 10 28 64.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 4 8 12 33.3% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 156 134 290 53.8% 88 76 164 53.7% 16 24 40 40.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — 94 97 191 49.2% 30 32 62 48.4% 9 11 20 45.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 427/488 of Kaia Kanepi's and 198/266 of Sybille Bammer's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kaia Kanepi Sybille Bammer
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
21 2006 5/30 3.2 3.6 50.1% 63.5% 51.7% 55.9% 43.1% 57.7% 43.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 21/30 3.0 7.0 57.0% 65.6% 38.7% 49.4% 52.0% 54.0% 42.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 37/51 2.4 5.1 58.3% 64.6% 45.9% 53.8% 50.1% 56.9% 45.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 35/36 3.1 5.3 52.3% 64.9% 42.8% 47.9% 52.3% 54.2% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 42/46 3.7 5.1 59.4% 68.5% 44.9% 53.1% 44.3% 59.0% 47.2% 2005 1/12 2.0 5.0 56.3% 52.4% 44.9% 46.2% 35.3% 49.1% 46.3%
26 2011 35/36 4.4 4.3 57.1% 67.9% 44.3% 58.6% 44.1% 57.8% 44.4% 2006 22/45 0.8 2.6 66.6% 57.9% 46.9% 47.3% 52.4% 53.5% 39.8%
27 2012 34/34 4.0 4.7 57.0% 70.7% 48.0% 55.5% 51.0% 61.0% 47.8% 2007 56/67 1.3 2.5 66.4% 63.7% 52.1% 57.0% 52.8% 60.1% 47.2%
28 2013 30/31 4.1 4.5 55.7% 69.5% 47.3% 59.5% 45.7% 59.5% 43.9% 2008 37/52 1.3 3.0 66.9% 57.4% 47.7% 51.5% 47.9% 53.8% 45.0%
29 2014 36/36 4.1 5.5 55.7% 65.5% 43.2% 50.9% 45.3% 55.4% 43.2% 2009 39/44 1.1 3.8 68.8% 58.1% 45.5% 54.4% 46.5% 54.3% 44.1%
30 2015 18/20 3.5 4.7 55.8% 66.6% 45.7% 55.4% 59.7% 57.3% 41.0% 2010 31/34 1.2 4.1 68.9% 58.1% 42.5% 49.1% 51.1% 53.7% 43.5%
31 2016 1/1 1.0 4.0 65.3% 65.6% 11.8% 16.7% 100.0% 46.9% 38.7% 2011 12/12 0.7 3.7 64.1% 53.4% 42.9% 45.9% 45.2% 49.6% 41.0%
32 2017 6/6 2.0 2.7 71.5% 61.5% 44.5% 61.3% 43.3% 56.5% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 22/24 2.6 4.5 59.6% 64.2% 47.7% 53.3% 45.4% 57.7% 44.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 18/18 3.5 4.7 58.4% 66.1% 42.5% 47.5% 39.9% 56.0% 44.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 5/5 3.6 3.2 58.7% 62.0% 47.8% 41.4% 49.8% 56.5% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 22/23 3.7 4.6 51.7% 65.7% 46.8% 49.5% 54.1% 56.4% 41.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 39/40 4.6 3.7 55.9% 68.5% 49.0% 49.4% 45.1% 59.7% 43.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 21/21 2.5 3.1 57.0% 66.2% 46.9% 46.5% 42.8% 57.7% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 427/500 3.6 4.7 56.7% 66.8% 45.4% 52.4% 47.7% 57.5% 44.2% — 198/273 1.1 3.2 67.2% 59.2% 47.3% 52.4% 49.8% 55.3% 44.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kaia Kanepi Sybille Bammer
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2001 1497 105.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 1498 103.4 — — — — — +23 — 40.0% -0.90 — — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1485 98.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1527 114.1 — — — — +28 — — 54.5% +0.18 1–0 2–1 (67%) — -0.08 2000 1487 99.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — +0.01
21 2006 1607 113.9 +0.07 -1.13 1.033 50.5% +4 -62 — 47.9% -0.39 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.1 +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 1581 120.1 -1.50 -0.76 0.926 48.4% +17 +20 -16 46.5% -0.18 4–7 (36%) 3–4 (43%) 96.3 +0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 1761 142.2 +1.74 +1.87 1.063 51.4% -2 -50 — 55.6% +0.40 13–9 (59%) 9–4 (69%) 107.7 +0.04 2003 1474 103.1 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.17
24 2009 1604 134.2 -0.69 +1.03 0.958 49.2% +69 +58 — 45.0% -0.20 4–8 (33%) 0–7 (0%) 89.0 +0.79 2004 1441 105.9 — — — — +35 — — 20.0% -1.50 0–2 0–1 — +0.03
25 2010 1842 146.9 +2.60 +3.18 1.151 53.0% -58 -100 -165 63.4% +0.93 3–8 (27%) 9–3 (75%) 101.4 -1.00 2005 1492 115.8 -0.71 -0.20 0.911 47.7% +24 — — 50.0% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 2–1 (67%) 99.5 +0.20
26 2011 1799 142.9 +1.95 +1.23 1.051 51.0% +49 -115 -218 50.6% +0.20 8–7 (53%) 3–6 (33%) 97.9 +0.49 2006 1568 125.9 -2.07 -2.76 0.856 47.0% -26 -35 +78 45.1% -0.47 6–10 (38%) 3–2 (60%) 101.1 -0.24
27 2012 1862 140.4 +3.77 +2.86 1.226 54.3% -34 -10 — 67.5% +1.30 7–2 (78%) 3–2 (60%) 104.5 +0.29 2007 1781 148.6 +3.74 +2.99 1.182 53.4% -39 -64 -97 63.8% +1.01 6–11 (35%) 6–7 (46%) 96.6 +1.23
28 2013 1838 132.3 +2.40 +0.55 1.085 51.8% -37 +75 -164 62.9% +0.74 6–2 (75%) 7–2 (78%) 106.6 +0.19 2008 1718 130.0 -1.29 +1.00 0.973 49.3% +25 -53 -79 51.2% -0.20 10–11 (48%) 6–5 (55%) 97.6 +4.02
29 2014 1719 134.8 +0.25 +0.12 0.969 49.5% +38 +81 -56 48.9% -0.16 7–9 (44%) 9–4 (69%) 97.8 -0.89 2009 1672 130.3 -0.57 +0.29 0.966 49.1% +6 +36 -62 49.5% -0.11 7–6 (54%) 4–2 (67%) 102.8 +0.49
30 2015 1659 126.5 -0.20 +0.50 0.961 49.3% +51 +100 — 47.5% -0.15 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — -0.35 2010 1649 124.3 -1.43 -0.06 0.939 48.6% +29 -16 -63 43.6% -0.38 6–4 (60%) 2–5 (29%) 98.7 -0.29
31 2016 1663 113.1 +1.02 -0.64 0.730 42.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — — — -0.02 2011 1570 105.8 -3.05 -1.68 0.813 45.3% +74 +18 — 27.6% -1.59 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 -0.29
32 2017 1732 125.4 -0.85 +0.35 0.969 49.3% +33 — — 57.1% -0.14 2–0 — — +0.38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1777 140.3 +1.23 +0.94 1.059 51.2% +67 -33 -156 54.7% +0.21 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) 93.5 -0.34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 1762 130.8 -0.84 +2.11 1.014 50.2% +14 +32 — 48.9% 0.00 5–4 (56%) 3–2 (60%) 102.0 -0.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 1729 113.7 +0.66 +1.49 1.042 51.0% +2 — — 41.7% +0.17 1–1 0–2 — -0.21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1700 135.8 +0.07 -0.08 0.950 49.1% +53 +14 — 44.0% -0.34 4–2 (67%) 2–5 (29%) 99.7 -1.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1802 144.9 +2.41 +0.90 1.071 51.2% +48 +6 -236 54.7% +0.25 11–8 (58%) 6–7 (46%) 100.8 -0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1627 124.3 +1.07 -1.99 0.962 49.0% +69 +54 — 38.0% -0.72 1–7 (13%) 2–8 (20%) 87.2 -0.08 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1909 143.0 +1.22 +1.05 1.039 50.8% +24 +4 -153 52.4% +0.17 85–88 (49%) 63–63 (50%) 96.4 -0.69 — 1846 135.5 +0.06 +0.67 0.994 49.8% +1 -21 -54 50.0% -0.07 39–51 (43%) 25–27 (48%) 97.1 +1.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.