H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Kaia Kanepi vs Virginie Razzano H2H: 2-5

Virginie Razzano holds a 5–2 lead over Kaia Kanepi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Virginie Razzano leads 4–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Virginie Razzano won the 2011 Miami second round 6-3 7-6(5).

EST Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
2 5
7 main draw meetings
FRA Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 18, 2018 Strasbourg WTA 500 Q1 Q Clay Kaia Kanepi #59 6-1 6-2 Virginie Razzano #578 Match data
Jan 1, 2016 Brisbane WTA 500 Q1 Q Hard Kaia Kanepi #122 6-4 6-7(4) 6-1 Virginie Razzano #200 Match data
Mar 23, 2011* Miami WTA 1000 R64 Hard Virginie Razzano #101 6-3 7-6(5) Kaia Kanepi #16 Match data
Mar 11, 2009* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Kaia Kanepi #21 7-6(2) 1-0 (ret.) Virginie Razzano #40 Match data
Feb 21, 2009* Dubai WTA 1000 SF Hard Virginie Razzano #58 6-1 6-2 Kaia Kanepi #24 Match data
Sep 19, 2008* Tokyo WTA 1000 R16 Hard Kaia Kanepi #39 6-4 6-2 Virginie Razzano #37 Match data
Jun 19, 2008* Eastbourne WTA 500 R32 Grass Virginie Razzano #28 6-3 6-4 Kaia Kanepi #35 Match data
Jan 4, 2007* Auckland WTA 250 R32 Hard Virginie Razzano #88 7-6(1) 6-1 Kaia Kanepi #78 Match data
Sep 2, 2006* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Virginie Razzano #112 7-5 6-2 Kaia Kanepi #87 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kaia Kanepi #1,322 #15 2,760 1,912 261 235 52.6% 0 0 0 2 2 4
Virginie Razzano #1,226 #16 2,420 1,876 200 216 48.1% 0 0 0 2 0 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kaia Kanepi Virginie Razzano
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #344 1,483 0 0
17 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0 2000 3–4 42.9% #143 1,507 0 0
18 2001 10–12 45.5% #87 1,589 0 0
19 2002 11–12 47.8% #76 1,662 0 0
20 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,538 0 0 2003 15–20 42.9% #72 1,613 0 0
21 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,610 0 0 2004 7–8 46.7% #60 1,604 0 0
22 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,583 0 0 2005 16–22 42.1% #51 1,608 0 0
23 2008 28–20 58.3% #27 1,747 0 0 2006 10–18 35.7% #88 1,595 0 0
24 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,598 0 0 2007 34–20 63.0% #28 1,805 0 2
25 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,839 0 1 2008 14–20 41.2% #58 1,633 0 2
26 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,816 0 1 2009 31–20 60.8% #19 1,801 0 2
27 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,868 0 3 2010 9–15 37.5% #113 1,660 0 2
28 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,841 0 4 2011 13–13 50.0% #83 1,681 0 2
29 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,718 0 4 2012 5–9 35.7% #160 1,633 0 2
30 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,649 0 4 2013 9–8 52.9% #99 1,683 0 2
31 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,655 0 4 2014 4–8 33.3% #165 1,621 0 2
32 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,725 0 4 2015 4–2 66.7% #200 1,657 0 2
33 2018 11–11 50.0% #61 1,776 0 4 2016 5–4 55.6% #169 1,647 0 2
34 2019 9–10 47.4% #101 1,748 0 4
35 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,719 0 4
36 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,703 0 4
37 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,801 0 4
38 2023 6–16 27.3% #168 1,607 0 4