H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:30 UTC

Kaia Kanepi vs Yanina Wickmayer H2H: 4-2

Kaia Kanepi holds a 4–2 lead over Yanina Wickmayer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Kaia Kanepi leads 4–1 on hard courts, while Yanina Wickmayer leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kaia Kanepi won the 2017 US Open second round 6-4 6-2.

EST Age 41 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"
H2H
4 2
6 main draw meetings
BEL Age 36 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 31, 2017* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Kaia Kanepi #418 6-4 6-2 Yanina Wickmayer #129 Match data
May 19, 2011* Brussels WTA 500 R32 Clay Yanina Wickmayer #22 6-1 4-6 7-5 Kaia Kanepi #16 Match data
Mar 10, 2011* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R32 Hard Yanina Wickmayer #25 3-6 6-4 6-1 Kaia Kanepi #16 Match data
Sep 7, 2010* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Kaia Kanepi #32 0-6 7-6(2) 6-1 Yanina Wickmayer #18 Match data
Oct 3, 2008* Japan Open WTA 500 R16 Hard Kaia Kanepi #33 3-6 6-1 6-0 Yanina Wickmayer #67 Match data
Sep 27, 2008* Seoul WTA 250 QF Hard Kaia Kanepi #34 6-1 6-4 Yanina Wickmayer #68 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kaia Kanepi #1,322 #15 2,760 1,912 261 235 52.6% 0 0 0 2 2 4
Yanina Wickmayer #765 #12 3,320 1,932 218 217 50.1% 0 0 0 3 2 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kaia Kanepi Yanina Wickmayer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2001 0–1 0.0% #200 1,496 0 0
17 2002 2–3 40.0% #285 1,498 0 0
18 2008 10–14 41.7% #73 1,539 0 0
19 2009 32–16 66.7% #16 1,843 0 2
20 2005 3–2 60.0% #98 1,538 0 0 2010 31–21 59.6% #23 1,769 0 3
21 2006 14–16 46.7% #78 1,610 0 0 2011 28–18 60.9% #26 1,771 0 3
22 2007 13–17 43.3% #75 1,583 0 0 2012 28–25 52.8% #23 1,614 0 3
23 2008 28–20 58.3% #27 1,747 0 0 2013 17–24 41.5% #51 1,588 0 3
24 2009 15–21 41.7% #58 1,598 0 0 2014 13–19 40.6% #75 1,556 0 3
25 2010 29–17 63.0% #22 1,839 0 1 2015 18–17 51.4% #41 1,684 0 4
26 2011 19–17 52.8% #34 1,816 0 1 2016 14–23 37.8% #58 1,574 0 5
27 2012 25–9 73.5% #19 1,868 0 3 2017 11–14 44.0% #115 1,624 0 5
28 2013 21–10 67.7% #30 1,841 0 4 2018 3–5 37.5% #122 1,637 0 5
29 2014 17–19 47.2% #51 1,718 0 4 2019 3–4 42.9% #152 1,560 0 5
30 2015 8–12 40.0% #122 1,649 0 4 2020 0–1 0.0% #166 1,565 0 5
31 2016 0–1 0.0% #376 1,655 0 4
32 2017 4–2 66.7% #100 1,725 0 4 2022 2–3 40.0% #321 1,554 0 5
33 2018 11–11 50.0% #61 1,776 0 4 2023 8–7 53.3% #71 1,651 0 5
34 2019 9–10 47.4% #101 1,748 0 4 2024 0–3 0.0% #765 1,530 0 5
35 2020 2–3 40.0% #93 1,719 0 4 2025 0–3 0.0% #765 1,500 0 5
36 2021 11–12 47.8% #73 1,703 0 4
37 2022 24–16 60.0% #32 1,801 0 4
38 2023 6–16 27.3% #168 1,607 0 4