H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Kamilla Rakhimova vs Caroline Garcia H2H: 1-2
Caroline Garcia holds a 2–1 lead over Kamilla Rakhimova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Caroline Garcia leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kamilla Rakhimova won the 2025 US Open first round 6-4 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UZB
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2025 | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kamilla Rakhimova | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
| Aug 31, 2022* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Caroline Garcia | 6-2 6-4 | Kamilla Rakhimova | Match data |
| Jun 23, 2022* | Bad Homburg | WTA 500 | R16 | Grass | Caroline Garcia | 6-3 6-4 | Kamilla Rakhimova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kamilla Rakhimova | #78 | #60 | 1,023 | 1,752 | 56 | 85 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kamilla Rakhimova | Caroline Garcia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #120 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #94 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2024 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2025 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #97 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2026 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #78 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 |