H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Kamilla Rakhimova vs Kristina Mladenovic H2H: 2-0
Kamilla Rakhimova holds a 2–0 lead over Kristina Mladenovic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kamilla Rakhimova leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kamilla Rakhimova won the 2022 Rouen quarterfinal 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UZB
Age 24
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 33
Right-Handed
184 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 2022 | Rouen | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Kamilla Rakhimova | 6-1 6-4 | Kristina Mladenovic | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2021* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Kamilla Rakhimova | 2-6 6-2 6-3 | Kristina Mladenovic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kamilla Rakhimova | #78 | #60 | 1,023 | 1,752 | 56 | 85 | 39.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kristina Mladenovic | #395 | #10 | 3,155 | 1,926 | 212 | 232 | 47.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kamilla Rakhimova | Kristina Mladenovic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2019 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #300 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2020 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #155 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2021 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #120 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2022 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #94 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 21–25 | 45.7% | #55 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2023 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #67 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2024 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #60 | 1,702 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 35–25 | 58.3% | #29 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2025 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #97 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #42 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2026 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #78 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 34–25 | 57.6% | #11 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 18–26 | 40.9% | #43 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 27–23 | 54.0% | #39 | 1,790 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #50 | 1,717 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #152 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #239 | 1,432 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #210 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |