Karin Knapp
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberta Vinci | 4 | 3 | 7 | Aug 12, 2015 | H2H |
| Caroline Garcia | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 5, 2015 | H2H |
| Johanna Larsson | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 31, 2016 | H2H |
| Lucie Safarova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 8, 2016 | H2H |
| Julia Goerges | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 23, 2016 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Karin Knapp vs Ipek Soylu H2H: 1-0
Karin Knapp holds a 1–0 lead over Ipek Soylu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karin Knapp leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karin Knapp won the 2014 Istanbul round of 32 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
1
–
0
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karin Knapp | 6-2 6-2 | Ipek Soylu | Match data | Jul 17, 2014* | R32 | Istanbul | International → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karin Knapp | #971 | #33 | 1,420 | 1,710 | 103 | 118 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ipek Soylu | #1,111 | #151 | 380 | 1,522 | 4 | 11 | 26.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karin Knapp | Ipek Soylu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #302 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #159 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #196 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #205 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #41 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #51 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,637 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #966 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Karin Knapp | Ipek Soylu | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2017 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 13 | 15 | 28 | 46.4% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 44 | 62 | 106 | 41.5% | 55 | 45 | 100 | 55.0% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 191/221 of Karin Knapp's and 15/15 of Ipek Soylu's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Karin Knapp | Ipek Soylu | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1/1 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 55.8% | 51.7% | 21.7% | 40.0% | 40.0% | 38.5% | 39.6% |
| 19 | 2006 | 2/7 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 56.9% | 69.2% | 46.9% | 37.5% | 67.9% | 60.1% | 43.1% | 2015 | 2/2 | 2.0 | 5.0 | 63.4% | 49.9% | 37.6% | 40.3% | 19.2% | 45.0% | 37.2% |
| 20 | 2007 | 19/28 | 3.0 | 6.3 | 54.6% | 65.6% | 42.6% | 50.6% | 36.5% | 55.0% | 44.6% | 2016 | 7/7 | 0.7 | 5.9 | 61.9% | 55.9% | 35.7% | 50.6% | 44.2% | 46.8% | 47.4% |
| 21 | 2008 | 21/25 | 2.1 | 5.0 | 60.9% | 60.3% | 40.5% | 48.7% | 51.3% | 52.6% | 43.1% | 2017 | 5/5 | 0.4 | 6.0 | 57.8% | 53.9% | 28.0% | 41.7% | 44.6% | 42.9% | 44.3% |
| 22 | 2009 | 8/9 | 0.8 | 5.3 | 50.2% | 59.7% | 41.0% | 49.3% | 44.6% | 49.7% | 43.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 3/3 | 1.0 | 10.7 | 59.1% | 60.2% | 39.8% | 51.3% | 49.7% | 51.6% | 41.5% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 14/14 | 1.6 | 6.0 | 59.3% | 60.0% | 40.5% | 49.9% | 43.5% | 52.0% | 44.1% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 29/35 | 2.9 | 5.0 | 56.6% | 67.7% | 43.8% | 54.9% | 50.9% | 57.4% | 46.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 39/42 | 3.6 | 4.7 | 57.7% | 65.5% | 43.2% | 50.6% | 51.2% | 55.9% | 41.9% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 41/42 | 2.5 | 4.2 | 64.1% | 61.4% | 48.0% | 52.5% | 49.5% | 56.7% | 43.8% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 14/15 | 2.7 | 4.9 | 56.1% | 61.7% | 41.1% | 46.8% | 45.0% | 52.8% | 40.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 48.1% | 60.0% | 29.6% | 58.3% | 50.0% | 44.2% | 44.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 191/221 | 2.6 | 5.1 | 58.6% | 63.4% | 43.5% | 51.0% | 48.2% | 55.0% | 43.6% | — | 15/15 | 0.7 | 6.0 | 60.3% | 54.1% | 32.5% | 45.5% | 40.7% | 44.7% | 44.5% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Karin Knapp | Ipek Soylu | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1487 | 95.9 | -3.07 | -0.66 | 0.643 | 39.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -4.00 | — | — | — | +0.02 |
| 19 | 2006 | 1513 | 108.6 | -0.12 | -2.10 | 1.081 | 52.1% | -5 | +47 | — | 47.1% | +0.47 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–4 (33%) | 98.3 | +0.25 | 2015 | 1494 | 91.1 | -2.34 | -1.15 | 0.676 | 41.0% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -6.00 | — | — | — | +0.11 |
| 20 | 2007 | 1587 | 121.4 | -0.55 | -0.12 | 0.990 | 49.7% | -69 | +90 | — | 49.3% | 0.00 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–3 (67%) | 101.3 | +0.69 | 2016 | 1471 | 98.5 | -3.81 | +0.46 | 0.890 | 47.0% | — | +17 | — | 35.3% | -1.41 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +0.33 |
| 21 | 2008 | 1603 | 120.0 | -1.76 | -0.63 | 0.909 | 48.0% | -25 | +27 | — | 46.6% | -0.74 | 3–5 (38%) | 5–3 (63%) | 99.5 | +1.04 | 2017 | 1506 | 104.4 | -4.21 | -0.60 | 0.776 | 43.7% | +9 | — | — | 20.0% | -2.10 | — | — | — | -0.22 |
| 22 | 2009 | 1556 | 96.3 | -3.79 | -1.88 | 0.874 | 46.7% | +5 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.75 | — | 1–1 | — | +1.05 | 2018 | 1485 | 98.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 1475 | 98.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2011 | 1531 | 107.5 | +1.01 | -0.38 | 0.858 | 47.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.11 | 0–3 (0%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 1562 | 108.4 | -2.46 | -0.27 | 0.918 | 48.2% | -36 | +93 | — | 45.7% | -0.69 | 5–2 (71%) | 1–1 | — | +0.13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 1681 | 127.7 | +1.14 | +1.48 | 1.097 | 52.0% | -86 | -9 | -89 | 57.3% | +0.40 | 5–7 (42%) | 5–1 (83%) | 103.3 | +0.66 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 1645 | 120.9 | -0.61 | -1.24 | 0.951 | 49.0% | -13 | -18 | — | 45.7% | -0.48 | 4–8 (33%) | 6–5 (55%) | 97.7 | +0.92 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 1704 | 130.8 | -0.82 | +1.99 | 1.010 | 50.4% | -81 | +81 | -160 | 53.8% | +0.27 | 6–5 (55%) | 7–7 (50%) | 102.7 | -0.73 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 1637 | 105.2 | -1.99 | -0.46 | 0.862 | 46.9% | -62 | +121 | — | 36.4% | -1.42 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–0 | — | -0.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 1618 | — | -0.56 | -4.07 | 0.802 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | +0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1711 | 124.9 | -0.85 | +0.14 | 0.969 | 49.4% | -43 | +53 | -119 | 48.2% | -0.26 | 31–43 (42%) | 37–26 (59%) | 103.3 | +1.45 | — | 1523 | 97.6 | -3.70 | -0.18 | 0.804 | 44.5% | +9 | +17 | — | 25.8% | -2.10 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | +1.60 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Ipek Soylu
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anna Tatishvili | 1 | 1 | 2 | Apr 14, 2016 | H2H |
| Shuai Zhang | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sep 21, 2017 | H2H |
| Maria Sakkari | 1 | 0 | 1 | Sep 20, 2017 | H2H |
| Carla Suárez Navarro | 0 | 1 | 1 | Aug 30, 2017 | H2H |
| Sara Sorribes Tormo | 0 | 1 | 1 | Apr 27, 2017 | H2H |