H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Karin Knapp vs Kveta Peschke H2H: 0-1
Kveta Peschke holds a 1–0 lead over Karin Knapp in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kveta Peschke leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kveta Peschke won the 2006 Luxembourg fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2006* | Luxembourg | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Kveta Peschke | 6-4 6-4 | Karin Knapp | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karin Knapp | #971 | #33 | 1,420 | 1,712 | 103 | 117 | 46.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Kveta Peschke | #264 | #26 | 1,028 | 1,826 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karin Knapp | Kveta Peschke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2008 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #205 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #60 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #44 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #47 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #85 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #41 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #148 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #51 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #147 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #30 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #966 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #133 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |