H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:32 UTC
Karolina Pliskova vs Alicia Molik H2H: 1-0
Karolina Pliskova holds a 1–0 lead over Alicia Molik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karolina Pliskova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Karolina Pliskova won the 2008 Prague third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Age 34
Right-Handed
186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 45
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2008* | Prague | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Karolina Pliskova | 6-4 6-4 | Alicia Molik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karolina Pliskova | #64 | #1 | 6,940 | 2,041 | 421 | 241 | 63.6% | 0 | 3 | 0 | 9 | 5 | 17 |
| Alicia Molik | #403 | #8 | 2,630 | 2,035 | 151 | 161 | 48.4% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karolina Pliskova | Alicia Molik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #736 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 2008 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #465 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #221 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #212 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #96 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #145 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #115 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #118 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #47 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2013 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #71 | 1,514 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 10–19 | 34.5% | #94 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #23 | 1,799 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #36 | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2015 | 50–25 | 66.7% | #11 | 1,813 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #13 | 1,938 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 2016 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #6 | 1,901 | 0 | 6 | 2005 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #28 | 1,779 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2017 | 52–18 | 74.3% | #4 | 1,930 | 0 | 9 | 2006 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #165 | 1,632 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2018 | 46–21 | 68.7% | #8 | 1,916 | 0 | 11 | 2007 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,628 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2019 | 51–16 | 76.1% | #2 | 1,975 | 0 | 15 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #308 | 1,577 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2020 | 14–8 | 63.6% | #6 | 1,914 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2021 | 35–18 | 66.0% | #4 | 1,972 | 0 | 16 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #129 | 1,561 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2022 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #31 | 1,834 | 0 | 16 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #349 | 1,584 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2023 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #38 | 1,759 | 0 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2024 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #41 | 1,777 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 19–8 | 70.4% | #64 | 1,879 | 0 | 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |