H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Karolina Pliskova vs Timea Babos H2H: 2-1

Karolina Pliskova holds a 2–1 lead over Timea Babos in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Karolina Pliskova leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Timea Babos won the 2016 Miami Open second round 5-7 6-2 7-6(0).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karolina Pliskova
Czech Republic Age 34 Right-Handed 186 cm / 6'1"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Timea Babos
Hungary Age 33 Right-Handed 179 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Timea Babos #49 5-7 6-2 7-6(0) Karolina Pliskova #14 Match data Mar 25, 2016* R64 Miami Open Premier Mandatory → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Karolina Pliskova #15 6-3 6-2 Timea Babos #74 Match data Oct 17, 2015* QF Tianjin International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Karolina Pliskova #7 6-4 7-5 Timea Babos #83 Match data Aug 20, 2015* R32 Cincinnati Open Premier 5 → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Karolina Pliskova #57 #1 6,940 2,045 430 248 63.4% 0 2 0 9 6 17
Timea Babos #451 #25 1,675 1,758 124 180 40.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karolina Pliskova Timea Babos
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 2007 0–1 0.0% #736 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 2008 2–1 66.7% #465 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 2009 0–1 0.0% #221 1,521 0 0 2010 0–1 0.0% #268 1,491 0 0
18 2010 0–1 0.0% #212 1,504 0 0 2011 1–1 50.0% #154 1,503 0 0
19 2011 0–3 0.0% #145 1,467 0 0 2012 14–15 48.3% #67 1,564 0 1
20 2012 1–6 14.3% #118 1,444 0 0 2013 9–16 36.0% #88 1,544 0 1
21 2013 11–15 42.3% #71 1,514 0 1 2014 4–11 26.7% #99 1,484 0 1
22 2014 44–24 64.7% #23 1,800 0 3 2015 12–21 36.4% #70 1,563 0 1
23 2015 50–25 66.7% #11 1,814 0 4 2016 35–28 55.6% #28 1,707 0 1
24 2016 41–21 66.1% #6 1,895 0 6 2017 20–26 43.5% #57 1,639 0 2
25 2017 52–18 74.3% #4 1,928 0 9 2018 19–24 44.2% #59 1,609 0 3
26 2018 48–22 68.6% #8 1,921 0 11 2019 6–16 27.3% #89 1,594 0 3
27 2019 51–16 76.1% #2 1,979 0 15 2020 0–6 0.0% #115 1,540 0 3
28 2020 14–8 63.6% #6 1,916 0 16 2021 3–9 25.0% #160 1,495 0 3
29 2021 37–19 66.1% #4 1,969 0 16 2022 0–1 0.0% #336 1,454 0 3
30 2022 21–19 52.5% #31 1,835 0 16 2023 1–3 25.0% #188 1,480 0 3
31 2023 17–20 45.9% #38 1,763 0 16 2024 0–2 0.0% #338 1,450 0 3
32 2024 20–17 54.1% #41 1,777 0 17 — — — — — — —
34 2026 21–11 65.6% #57 1,855 0 17 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Karolina Pliskova Timea Babos
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 2007 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
18 2010 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2011 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
19 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 7 6 13 53.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 3 4 7 42.9%
20 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 6 11 17 35.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
21 2013 8 8 16 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 2 8 10 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
22 2014 36 18 54 66.7% 7 4 11 63.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 2015 6 11 17 35.3% 4 7 11 36.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
23 2015 37 19 56 66.1% 7 3 10 70.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 2016 25 19 44 56.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 2016 25 13 38 65.8% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 3 13 76.9% 2017 19 17 36 52.8% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 4 4 0.0%
25 2017 37 12 49 75.5% 9 5 14 64.3% 6 1 7 85.7% 2018 17 16 33 51.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 3 3 0.0%
26 2018 32 16 48 66.7% 11 3 14 78.6% 5 3 8 62.5% 2019 5 13 18 27.8% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
27 2019 34 11 45 75.6% 8 3 11 72.7% 9 2 11 81.8% 2020 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2020 9 6 15 60.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2021 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 2021 23 12 35 65.7% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 3 9 66.7% 2022 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2022 12 10 22 54.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 2023 14 14 28 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2024 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 2024 15 11 26 57.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 6 5 11 54.5% 9 3 12 75.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 289 160 449 64.4% 83 56 139 59.7% 58 32 90 64.4% — 90 113 203 44.3% 25 45 70 35.7% 9 22 31 29.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 614/678 of Karolina Pliskova's and 283/304 of Timea Babos's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Karolina Pliskova Timea Babos
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 2007 1/1 5.0 2.0 39.7% 55.2% 50.0% 40.0% 83.3% 52.1% 45.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 2/3 1.5 4.0 54.7% 62.1% 35.7% 28.3% 62.5% 50.0% 32.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 1/1 4.0 2.0 57.1% 61.1% 37.0% 50.0% 16.7% 50.8% 33.3%
18 2010 1/1 2.0 3.0 63.1% 65.9% 37.5% 57.1% 25.0% 55.4% 31.7% 2011 2/2 2.5 2.5 60.9% 71.5% 44.6% 50.0% 51.0% 61.3% 43.0%
19 2011 3/3 4.7 2.7 60.4% 63.4% 33.2% 48.5% 33.3% 51.4% 33.2% 2012 26/29 5.0 4.3 60.5% 65.8% 43.9% 52.1% 43.9% 57.0% 41.9%
20 2012 7/7 6.1 2.9 63.3% 66.4% 40.1% 54.0% 42.5% 56.9% 32.6% 2013 24/25 4.5 3.8 57.6% 62.5% 43.5% 48.6% 46.0% 54.5% 39.3%
21 2013 23/26 6.7 3.0 58.1% 72.6% 43.5% 56.8% 43.9% 60.7% 38.6% 2014 13/15 5.7 4.2 60.5% 65.3% 43.7% 57.7% 37.2% 56.8% 38.9%
22 2014 66/68 6.5 2.9 58.8% 71.6% 47.2% 53.4% 43.5% 61.4% 42.8% 2015 25/33 3.3 3.3 67.1% 62.8% 48.2% 50.8% 42.4% 57.7% 38.1%
23 2015 58/75 6.9 3.3 61.3% 72.1% 49.2% 58.3% 52.8% 63.4% 40.3% 2016 57/63 4.5 3.6 62.3% 66.7% 46.0% 50.8% 46.3% 58.9% 43.2%
24 2016 52/62 8.8 2.7 58.4% 75.5% 46.8% 58.8% 45.4% 63.3% 43.9% 2017 46/46 4.6 3.5 62.3% 68.8% 43.7% 54.7% 49.3% 59.4% 40.0%
25 2017 60/70 6.6 2.9 58.6% 74.5% 48.5% 59.7% 46.2% 63.9% 44.3% 2018 42/43 4.4 4.0 60.0% 68.8% 46.8% 57.6% 44.3% 60.0% 41.8%
26 2018 63/70 5.8 3.6 63.6% 69.7% 47.0% 58.1% 46.6% 61.2% 43.4% 2019 22/22 3.9 4.5 58.6% 64.9% 40.5% 59.3% 38.6% 54.7% 37.9%
27 2019 63/67 7.6 3.1 65.9% 74.0% 46.0% 57.9% 48.3% 64.3% 45.1% 2020 6/6 1.0 3.5 59.2% 63.9% 42.1% 38.2% 45.8% 54.9% 31.3%
28 2020 22/22 5.6 4.0 61.4% 70.4% 46.7% 58.2% 46.1% 61.2% 43.7% 2021 12/12 4.3 4.3 55.0% 61.9% 39.8% 45.9% 48.4% 52.3% 37.6%
29 2021 50/56 7.3 5.7 62.3% 70.4% 43.6% 61.3% 46.0% 60.1% 41.8% 2022 1/1 3.0 4.0 60.6% 55.0% 46.2% 60.0% 25.0% 51.5% 38.6%
30 2022 40/40 6.7 5.9 64.1% 67.5% 41.7% 57.9% 48.6% 58.5% 41.2% 2023 4/4 1.8 4.3 62.9% 60.5% 40.4% 53.2% 74.6% 52.8% 42.7%
31 2023 36/37 6.4 4.5 65.1% 69.3% 38.7% 53.3% 49.4% 58.7% 42.2% 2024 2/2 9.0 3.5 57.7% 62.3% 54.4% 77.3% 19.6% 59.0% 34.4%
32 2024 35/37 7.1 6.9 64.5% 68.0% 42.9% 61.2% 50.7% 59.0% 41.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 32/33 3.6 5.6 65.3% 66.9% 42.3% 54.1% 52.7% 58.4% 40.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 614/679 6.7 3.9 62.0% 71.2% 45.3% 57.5% 47.5% 61.3% 42.3% — 283/304 4.3 3.8 61.0% 66.0% 44.6% 53.1% 45.0% 57.6% 40.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Karolina Pliskova Timea Babos
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 2007 1491 98.9 -2.80 -7.65 0.953 48.7% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 2008 1531 101.3 -0.28 -0.31 0.643 42.7% — +24 — 57.1% -0.71 1–0 — — -0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2009 1522 99.9 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 1–0 — -0.16 2010 1491 99.7 +0.22 -2.30 0.677 42.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.12
18 2010 1504 97.5 -1.06 +0.20 0.710 44.0% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.13 2011 1503 104.3 +0.80 +0.51 1.109 51.4% — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 1–0 — -0.11
19 2011 1468 97.1 +1.66 -2.13 0.683 42.9% — — — 14.3% -2.43 0–1 — — +0.18 2012 1564 115.8 +1.04 -1.36 0.976 49.4% +20 -33 +62 49.3% -0.38 5–8 (38%) 6–5 (55%) 101.9 +0.38
20 2012 1445 104.0 +1.53 -4.70 0.756 45.0% +44 — — 14.3% -2.14 — — — -0.46 2013 1544 111.1 -0.34 -3.76 0.862 46.9% +14 +4 — 38.6% -0.95 5–4 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 102.2 -0.12
21 2013 1515 116.1 +2.68 -3.87 0.984 49.7% +34 -71 +36 45.0% -0.27 3–5 (38%) 1–2 (33%) 98.0 -0.31 2014 1484 110.0 -0.66 -2.53 0.902 47.8% -2 — +90 40.0% -0.17 1–6 (14%) 1–3 (25%) 91.7 +0.74
22 2014 1801 141.2 +4.39 -0.61 1.109 51.9% 0 -220 -224 60.9% +0.70 15–10 (60%) 10–7 (59%) 106.9 +0.20 2015 1563 124.4 +0.04 -1.97 0.900 47.9% -39 -34 +34 38.2% -0.59 5–5 (50%) 4–8 (33%) 99.5 -2.03
23 2015 1815 145.3 +4.92 -0.94 1.100 51.8% +19 -177 -128 60.8% +0.67 19–7 (73%) 13–11 (54%) 108.0 +2.74 2016 1708 138.3 +2.77 +0.15 1.051 51.1% -28 -88 -104 53.8% +0.53 11–9 (55%) 7–12 (37%) 101.7 -0.26
24 2016 1896 151.5 +6.52 +1.70 1.194 53.3% +6 -233 -105 61.9% +0.99 11–6 (65%) 9–14 (39%) 101.0 -0.57 2017 1639 130.8 +1.85 -2.67 0.986 49.9% +63 -67 -124 48.6% -0.01 6–13 (32%) 6–6 (50%) 93.3 +1.56
25 2017 1929 157.4 +7.32 +1.47 1.225 53.9% +22 -159 -42 68.6% +1.31 12–7 (63%) 8–11 (42%) 99.8 +1.32 2018 1610 134.0 +2.55 -1.23 1.046 50.9% +53 -69 -106 50.0% +0.25 3–11 (21%) 3–7 (30%) 88.6 +0.06
26 2018 1921 156.9 +4.54 +1.21 1.118 52.1% +3 +8 -35 62.5% +0.75 16–6 (73%) 12–8 (60%) 105.8 -0.73 2019 1595 114.5 -1.44 -4.46 0.838 46.6% +29 -87 — 35.4% -1.15 1–7 (13%) 3–3 (50%) 93.4 +0.77
27 2019 1980 157.5 +7.44 +2.67 1.263 54.4% +1 -8 -3 68.7% +1.37 19–12 (61%) 8–8 (50%) 98.3 +1.00 2020 1540 108.8 +0.56 -3.13 0.694 43.3% +28 — — 7.7% -2.85 0–1 1–0 — -0.09
28 2020 1917 146.8 +3.25 +0.83 1.125 52.4% -13 +73 — 58.8% +0.96 5–2 (71%) 2–7 (22%) 97.0 -0.18 2021 1496 105.1 -3.04 -3.61 0.789 45.0% +56 -88 — 29.2% -1.79 1–1 2–0 — +0.01
29 2021 1970 149.6 +3.90 +0.30 1.047 51.1% -17 +46 +115 59.8% +0.56 13–4 (76%) 8–6 (57%) 104.7 +1.20 2022 1454 101.3 +1.41 -1.79 0.796 44.9% — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.06
30 2022 1836 136.2 +1.10 -0.03 0.992 50.1% +34 +46 +173 48.5% +0.10 12–5 (71%) 6–9 (40%) 97.8 +1.04 2023 1481 113.2 -0.36 -1.04 0.905 48.0% — -15 — 33.3% -1.11 0–1 0–1 — +0.04
31 2023 1763 149.7 +2.46 +0.60 1.021 50.2% +68 +75 +144 48.1% +0.15 4–7 (36%) 1–8 (11%) 87.6 +0.27 2024 1451 103.6 -0.62 +0.09 0.841 46.5% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–1 0–2 — +0.13
32 2024 1778 141.4 +1.97 -0.71 1.007 50.4% +61 -2 +155 56.2% +0.14 9–10 (47%) 9–5 (64%) 100.9 -0.55 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2025 1728 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2026 1856 135.9 +1.06 -1.25 0.979 49.3% -58 +30 +102 58.9% -0.01 8–3 (73%) 8–3 (73%) 108.7 +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2045 152.8 +4.37 +0.29 1.095 51.7% +14 -53 +11 59.3% +0.63 147–86 (63%) 96–100 (49%) 101.2 +0.73 — 1758 128.1 +1.05 -1.91 0.952 49.0% +18 -54 -13 44.6% -0.28 38–68 (36%) 39–50 (44%) 90.6 +0.30

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.