H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Karolina Sprem vs Kveta Peschke H2H: 0-1
Kveta Peschke holds a 1–0 lead over Karolina Sprem in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kveta Peschke leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kveta Peschke won the 2006 Antwerp third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 51
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 16, 2006* | Antwerp | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Kveta Peschke | 6-1 6-2 | Karolina Sprem | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karolina Sprem | #921 | #17 | 1,504 | 1,867 | 91 | 103 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kveta Peschke | #264 | #26 | 1,028 | 1,826 | 92 | 115 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karolina Sprem | Kveta Peschke | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #237 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #18 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #209 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #60 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #44 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2009 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #92 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #47 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #85 | 1,716 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #817 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #148 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,676 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #30 | 1,770 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7–20 | 25.9% | #133 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #264 | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |