H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Karolina Sprem vs Maria Elena Camerin H2H: 2-1
Karolina Sprem holds a 2–1 lead over Maria Elena Camerin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Karolina Sprem leads 2–0 on clay, while Maria Elena Camerin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karolina Sprem won the 2010 Bastad third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2010* | Bastad | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Karolina Sprem | 7-5 6-2 | Maria Elena Camerin | Match data |
| May 25, 2005* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Karolina Sprem | 6-4 6-2 | Maria Elena Camerin | Match data |
| Oct 1, 2004* | Hasselt | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Maria Elena Camerin | 6-4 6-4 | Karolina Sprem | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karolina Sprem | #921 | #17 | 1,504 | 1,867 | 91 | 103 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Maria Elena Camerin | #817 | #41 | 774 | 1,666 | 97 | 147 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karolina Sprem | Maria Elena Camerin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #18 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #112 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #123 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #100 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #209 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #43 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #92 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #50 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #817 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 5–14 | 26.3% | #114 | 1,475 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #111 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #177 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #192 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |