H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Karolina Sprem vs Maria Elena Camerin H2H: 2-1

Karolina Sprem holds a 2–1 lead over Maria Elena Camerin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Karolina Sprem leads 2–0 on clay, while Maria Elena Camerin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karolina Sprem won the 2010 Bastad round of 32 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karolina Sprem
CRO Age 41 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main-draw meetings
Maria Elena Camerin
ITA Age 44 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Karolina Sprem #91 7-5 6-2 Maria Elena Camerin #127 Match data Jul 8, 2010* R32 Bastad International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Karolina Sprem #28 6-4 6-2 Maria Elena Camerin #63 Match data May 25, 2005* R128 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay
Maria Elena Camerin #45 6-4 6-4 Karolina Sprem #18 Match data Oct 1, 2004* R16 Hasselt Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Karolina Sprem #921 #17 1,504 1,854 93 104 47.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maria Elena Camerin #817 #41 774 1,667 98 148 39.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karolina Sprem Maria Elena Camerin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #273 1,482 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 2003 12–8 60.0% #59 1,603 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 32–23 58.2% #18 1,761 0 0 2001 6–5 54.5% #112 1,546 0 0
20 2005 15–23 39.5% #65 1,659 0 0 2002 5–8 38.5% #123 1,524 0 0
21 2006 12–16 42.9% #89 1,626 0 0 2003 3–8 27.3% #100 1,494 0 0
22 2007 4–5 44.4% #209 1,612 0 0 2004 22–20 52.4% #43 1,663 0 0
23 2008 7–7 50.0% #174 1,623 0 0 2005 11–22 33.3% #99 1,564 0 0
24 2009 3–8 27.3% #92 1,568 0 0 2006 22–23 48.9% #50 1,610 0 0
25 2010 8–12 40.0% #94 1,562 0 0 2007 9–18 33.3% #100 1,546 0 0
26 2011 0–1 0.0% #817 1,544 0 0 2008 5–11 31.2% #104 1,512 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2009 5–14 26.3% #114 1,475 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2010 6–11 35.3% #111 1,495 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2011 1–4 20.0% #177 1,491 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2012 1–2 33.3% #168 1,499 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2013 2–2 50.0% #192 1,519 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Karolina Sprem Maria Elena Camerin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 17 14 31 54.8% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 2001 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2005 12 15 27 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 2002 3 2 5 60.0% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 2 10 12 16.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2003 1 3 4 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2004 16 11 27 59.3% 5 6 11 45.5% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
23 2008 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2005 9 13 22 40.9% 1 5 6 16.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 16 13 29 55.2% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2010 4 4 8 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 5 9 14 35.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 3 4 7 42.9% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 4 9 13 30.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 5 4 9 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 37 51 88 42.0% 42 38 80 52.5% 10 10 20 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — 62 71 133 46.6% 32 56 88 36.4% 4 19 23 17.4% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 82/196 of Karolina Sprem's and 104/222 of Maria Elena Camerin's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Karolina Sprem Maria Elena Camerin
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2003 2/20 2.5 6.0 49.5% 62.9% 34.7% 46.4% 27.5% 48.7% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 7/55 3.0 6.0 53.9% 63.7% 41.1% 57.9% 39.2% 53.4% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 7/38 1.0 4.9 42.9% 51.0% 42.0% 28.6% 37.0% 46.0% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 17/28 3.3 5.5 52.7% 63.5% 46.6% 60.8% 57.7% 55.2% 43.4% 2003 3/11 1.0 3.3 66.3% 64.6% 48.8% 70.5% 43.5% 59.2% 39.8%
22 2007 7/9 2.4 6.0 50.3% 65.9% 41.1% 64.4% 45.9% 53.6% 40.1% 2004 6/42 1.0 2.7 64.3% 55.2% 46.8% 52.7% 53.4% 51.8% 45.0%
23 2008 12/14 3.9 4.6 54.4% 68.0% 47.0% 58.2% 44.7% 58.6% 45.0% 2005 3/33 0.3 2.3 66.0% 47.5% 32.0% 53.9% 44.4% 42.5% 38.4%
24 2009 10/11 3.9 6.2 53.2% 66.7% 44.2% 44.0% 40.1% 56.3% 38.6% 2006 19/45 0.8 3.7 62.8% 58.0% 45.5% 50.8% 51.1% 53.2% 44.0%
25 2010 19/20 4.6 4.8 51.2% 70.9% 48.0% 46.1% 35.3% 59.7% 39.9% 2007 19/27 0.7 5.8 60.3% 56.8% 40.9% 46.5% 50.0% 50.8% 44.1%
26 2011 1/1 8.0 11.0 54.1% 67.9% 31.1% 66.7% 45.5% 51.0% 42.7% 2008 13/16 0.5 4.5 63.7% 54.4% 41.2% 36.3% 47.4% 49.5% 38.7%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 17/19 0.7 4.3 61.7% 54.9% 39.8% 40.4% 51.9% 49.0% 45.3%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 14/17 1.0 5.9 63.1% 54.9% 38.3% 36.0% 51.1% 48.7% 40.7%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 5/5 0.6 7.4 57.0% 54.3% 32.2% 39.3% 42.9% 44.3% 43.1%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 3/3 1.3 4.3 57.7% 58.0% 43.3% 62.4% 58.3% 51.6% 45.0%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 2/4 1.0 5.0 63.2% 53.6% 39.6% 56.1% 46.5% 48.6% 47.0%
Career — 82/197 3.5 5.4 51.7% 65.4% 44.9% 52.0% 43.2% 55.6% 41.9% — 104/246 0.8 4.7 62.2% 55.9% 41.2% 45.2% 50.0% 50.2% 42.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Karolina Sprem Maria Elena Camerin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2002 1483 93.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 1604 127.0 -1.05 -1.09 0.686 41.7% — +85 — 51.0% +0.04 8–3 (73%) 2–3 (40%) 108.1 -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1761 145.8 -0.31 -1.03 0.870 47.2% -93 -1 -10 58.1% +0.55 6–10 (38%) 6–2 (75%) 101.9 -1.22 2001 1546 108.1 — — — — — +58 — 56.0% +0.12 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.85
20 2005 1659 133.4 -3.79 +1.69 0.885 46.7% +25 +35 — 42.7% -0.76 5–8 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 97.8 -0.42 2002 1525 104.8 — — — — +9 +20 — 35.7% -0.68 2–2 (50%) — — +0.88
21 2006 1626 122.4 -0.58 -0.67 0.970 49.8% -80 +129 +85 43.8% -0.23 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 -0.32 2003 1495 108.8 +1.20 -0.47 0.973 50.2% +30 -5 — 38.5% -0.62 0–4 (0%) 2–1 (67%) 95.3 +0.46
22 2007 1613 105.7 -1.15 -1.26 0.864 47.0% — +130 — 47.6% -0.33 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.37 2004 1663 123.4 -1.01 -0.43 0.934 48.6% +23 -138 -150 49.0% -0.09 9–3 (75%) 3–3 (50%) 107.2 -0.10
23 2008 1624 118.5 +1.82 +0.88 1.087 52.2% — +63 — 54.3% +0.43 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 94.8 -0.54 2005 1564 109.3 -3.27 -1.94 0.669 41.3% +36 -101 -92 36.8% -0.65 4–6 (40%) 1–6 (14%) 94.3 +1.00
24 2009 1569 117.7 +0.90 -2.06 0.883 47.8% -19 +54 — 40.7% -0.70 0–5 (0%) — — -0.09 2006 1611 121.4 -1.81 -0.26 0.940 49.0% +12 -112 -120 49.5% -0.03 5–6 (45%) 2–2 (50%) 99.2 +0.09
25 2010 1563 118.6 +2.17 -2.28 0.992 49.6% +13 -2 +117 44.4% +0.02 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.13 2007 1547 119.6 -2.46 -0.09 0.897 47.4% +36 -41 — 39.1% -0.94 3–7 (30%) 4–3 (57%) 97.9 -0.88
26 2011 1545 98.1 +0.35 -2.30 0.871 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18 2008 1513 107.2 -3.15 -3.06 0.768 44.3% +74 -63 — 39.5% -0.95 1–5 (17%) 2–0 — -0.17
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1476 106.2 -4.26 +0.53 0.887 47.3% +48 -10 -46 33.3% -0.96 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.07
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1496 96.3 -4.40 -1.63 0.794 44.8% +59 -78 — 34.1% -1.44 5–2 (71%) — — +0.60
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1492 104.5 -2.78 -0.88 0.774 43.8% — -65 — 27.3% -2.27 0–1 — — -0.65
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1500 108.0 -0.75 +0.30 0.931 48.5% — — — 33.3% -0.83 — 0–1 — -0.27
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1520 103.4 -0.44 -2.36 0.915 47.9% — -33 — 50.0% -0.30 1–1 1–1 — -0.06
Career — 1855 135.3 +0.29 -0.90 0.944 48.9% -39 +66 +51 48.8% -0.08 29–44 (40%) 18–17 (51%) 95.7 -1.18 — 1668 116.9 -2.74 -0.75 0.863 46.8% +31 -52 -105 41.9% -0.58 33–44 (43%) 18–20 (47%) 98.0 +0.68

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.