H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Karolina Sprem vs Tatiana Golovin H2H: 1-1
Karolina Sprem and Tatiana Golovin are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karolina Sprem leads 1–0 on clay, while Tatiana Golovin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tatiana Golovin won the 2005 Toronto second round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 38
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2005 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Tatiana Golovin | 6-4 6-4 | Karolina Sprem | Match data |
| May 22, 2003* | Strasbourg | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Karolina Sprem | 6-4 1-6 6-4 | Tatiana Golovin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karolina Sprem | #921 | #17 | 1,504 | 1,867 | 91 | 103 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Tatiana Golovin | #1,128 | #12 | 1,882 | 2,012 | 131 | 80 | 62.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karolina Sprem | Tatiana Golovin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #358 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,771 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #22 | 1,830 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #18 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 43–17 | 71.7% | #13 | 1,981 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2005 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #254 | 1,890 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #209 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #92 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #817 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |