H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Katarina Srebotnik vs Iveta Benesova H2H: 2-1
Katarina Srebotnik holds a 2–1 lead over Iveta Benesova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Katarina Srebotnik leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Katarina Srebotnik won the 2008 Prague quarterfinal 7-5 4-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 43
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2008* | Prague | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Katarina Srebotnik | 7-5 4-6 6-2 | Iveta Benesova | Match data |
| Jan 18, 2007* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Katarina Srebotnik | 7-6(0) 6-7(6) 6-1 | Iveta Benesova | Match data |
| Aug 29, 2004* | Forest Hills | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Iveta Benesova | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Iveta Benesova | #671 | #25 | 1,811 | 1,760 | 177 | 221 | 44.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katarina Srebotnik | Iveta Benesova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 | 2002 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #82 | 1,565 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #132 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 25–19 | 56.8% | #36 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 21–27 | 43.8% | #55 | 1,613 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #58 | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,641 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 29–25 | 53.7% | #38 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #59 | 1,636 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #54 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #81 | 1,587 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–5 | 0.0% | #671 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |