H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Katarina Srebotnik vs Stephanie Foretz Gacon H2H: 2-0

Katarina Srebotnik holds a 2–0 lead over Stephanie Foretz Gacon in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Katarina Srebotnik leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katarina Srebotnik won the 2006 Australian Open first round 6-4 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Katarina Srebotnik
SLO Age 45 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Stephanie Foretz Gacon
FRA Age 45 Right-Handed 166 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Katarina Srebotnik #35 6-4 6-3 Stephanie Foretz Gacon Match data Jan 18, 2006* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Katarina Srebotnik #63 6-2 6-4 Stephanie Foretz Gacon Match data Jul 28, 2005* R32 Budapest Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Katarina Srebotnik #704 #20 2,474 1,851 225 206 52.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Stephanie Foretz Gacon — — — 1,647 61 115 34.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Katarina Srebotnik Stephanie Foretz Gacon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 1999 11–11 50.0% #66 1,520 0 1 1999 1–2 33.3% — 1,511 0 0
19 2000 8–19 29.6% #120 1,449 0 1 2000 1–2 33.3% — 1,513 0 0
20 2001 7–11 38.9% #97 1,494 0 1 2001 5–6 45.5% — 1,558 0 0
21 2002 28–18 60.9% #36 1,724 0 2 2002 11–12 47.8% — 1,604 0 0
22 2003 25–24 51.0% #39 1,682 0 2 2003 12–15 44.4% — 1,589 0 0
23 2004 14–19 42.4% #87 1,604 0 2 2004 3–10 23.1% — 1,532 0 0
24 2005 28–17 62.2% #27 1,753 0 4 2005 5–14 26.3% — 1,500 0 0
25 2006 30–24 55.6% #23 1,786 0 4 2006 5–14 26.3% — 1,443 0 0
26 2007 28–23 54.9% #27 1,756 0 4 2007 2–6 25.0% — 1,457 0 0
27 2008 41–25 62.1% #20 1,834 0 4 2008 0–2 0.0% — 1,455 0 0
28 2009 2–5 28.6% #428 1,743 0 4 2009 2–7 22.2% — 1,421 0 0
29 2010 3–10 23.1% #317 1,622 0 4 2010 0–3 0.0% — 1,401 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2011 2–6 25.0% — 1,406 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2012 10–10 50.0% — 1,513 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2013 2–5 28.6% — 1,501 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Katarina Srebotnik Stephanie Foretz Gacon
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 1999 1 5 6 16.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
19 2000 3 9 12 25.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2000 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
20 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 4 3 7 57.1% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 2002 13 8 21 61.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2002 5 6 11 45.5% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
22 2003 13 12 25 52.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2003 7 9 16 43.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2004 1 7 8 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
24 2005 21 9 30 70.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2005 2 9 11 18.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
25 2006 19 15 34 55.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2006 3 5 8 37.5% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2007 17 14 31 54.8% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2007 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2008 24 16 40 60.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2009 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
29 2010 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2010 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 5 9 44.4% 3 3 6 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 124 114 238 52.1% 82 63 145 56.6% 12 18 30 40.0% 7 11 18 38.9% — 31 59 90 34.4% 17 37 54 31.5% 11 17 28 39.3% 2 2 4 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 180/318 of Katarina Srebotnik's and 74/136 of Stephanie Foretz Gacon's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Katarina Srebotnik Stephanie Foretz Gacon
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
22 2003 5/49 1.8 2.8 61.3% 64.2% 49.5% 61.9% 41.5% 58.3% 43.3% 2003 4/27 1.5 6.8 53.2% 54.0% 39.1% 53.8% 40.0% 47.2% 46.4%
23 2004 6/33 1.8 3.7 60.5% 56.9% 38.9% 36.1% 56.4% 50.5% 46.9% 2004 5/13 1.2 5.2 56.7% 53.9% 47.6% 47.1% 38.1% 51.2% 42.6%
24 2005 6/45 1.3 1.3 63.8% 61.5% 44.7% 52.3% 49.0% 55.8% 42.7% 2005 6/19 2.5 7.0 59.4% 57.9% 44.5% 44.9% 46.2% 52.7% 44.4%
25 2006 40/54 2.6 1.9 65.7% 67.5% 47.7% 56.2% 51.5% 60.8% 45.8% 2006 12/19 1.8 4.7 61.9% 55.5% 38.3% 47.5% 40.8% 49.8% 41.6%
26 2007 47/51 2.7 2.6 67.2% 65.3% 45.8% 54.6% 48.1% 58.9% 45.5% 2007 4/8 1.8 6.8 57.8% 60.3% 32.5% 55.1% 54.2% 48.5% 36.2%
27 2008 57/66 3.6 2.8 61.1% 69.0% 50.3% 53.3% 48.9% 61.8% 45.4% 2008 1/2 1.0 1.0 70.7% 58.5% 23.5% 33.3% 100.0% 48.3% 34.6%
28 2009 7/7 1.1 4.9 61.4% 58.3% 39.0% 43.0% 48.9% 50.9% 42.2% 2009 8/9 1.8 4.8 62.8% 61.0% 46.9% 44.2% 42.6% 55.2% 41.2%
29 2010 12/13 2.3 4.5 63.1% 62.2% 43.3% 51.9% 36.2% 55.5% 38.2% 2010 2/3 1.5 3.5 59.5% 52.1% 24.3% 28.6% 7.1% 41.4% 30.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 7/8 3.0 4.0 58.8% 58.6% 43.5% 50.7% 57.5% 52.6% 39.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 18/20 2.6 3.6 55.5% 63.4% 44.5% 58.3% 46.7% 55.2% 44.8%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 6/7 1.3 3.7 55.2% 52.9% 37.3% 36.4% 53.7% 46.0% 46.9%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 13.0 7.0 64.1% 73.8% 36.2% 50.0% 42.9% 60.3% 41.5%
Career — 180/431 2.8 2.7 64.0% 66.0% 47.0% 53.4% 48.4% 59.3% 44.8% — 74/176 2.2 4.7 58.5% 58.6% 41.4% 49.0% 45.9% 51.6% 42.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Katarina Srebotnik Stephanie Foretz Gacon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 1999 1520 114.5 — — — — -39 +131 — 48.9% -0.04 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — +1.91 1999 1511 107.7 — — — — — +38 — 37.5% -1.38 1–1 2–1 (67%) — -0.39
19 2000 1450 112.4 — — — — +44 +97 — 34.4% -0.79 2–7 (22%) 1–4 (20%) 92.6 +0.46 2000 1513 105.7 — — — — — +27 — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 1–0 — +0.01
20 2001 1494 114.5 — — — — -1 +52 — 41.5% -0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 100.5 +0.12 2001 1559 118.8 — — — — +31 -46 — 46.4% -0.04 3–3 (50%) 1–0 — -0.48
21 2002 1724 137.6 — — — — -64 -4 -229 55.9% +0.46 9–5 (64%) 2–6 (25%) 103.9 -0.69 2002 1605 127.2 — — — — -4 -29 -66 50.0% -0.10 1–3 (25%) 5–1 (83%) 101.5 +0.03
22 2003 1682 127.1 +1.15 +0.28 1.039 50.6% -14 +27 -125 47.2% -0.10 9–7 (56%) 4–6 (40%) 100.2 +0.07 2003 1589 115.5 -3.06 +0.16 0.879 47.0% 0 -51 +46 43.3% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 4–0 (100%) 104.2 +0.97
23 2004 1604 113.1 -1.79 +0.77 0.946 48.8% -16 +108 -137 42.3% -0.62 3–4 (43%) 0–4 (0%) 94.7 +0.35 2004 1532 111.6 -1.58 -0.22 0.873 47.0% -19 +10 — 31.3% -1.19 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 100.0 -0.31
24 2005 1754 134.9 +0.20 -0.62 0.965 49.0% -3 -80 -248 58.5% +0.66 10–8 (56%) 5–4 (56%) 103.2 +0.75 2005 1501 103.6 -0.99 -0.13 0.938 48.6% -44 -15 +148 29.3% -1.44 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 98.1 -0.82
25 2006 1787 145.5 +3.94 +1.32 1.169 53.1% +10 -81 -227 56.3% +0.69 6–7 (46%) 4–7 (36%) 96.4 +0.95 2006 1444 101.7 -4.22 -1.54 0.829 45.8% +32 -13 — 32.6% -1.22 3–5 (38%) 0–2 — +0.07
26 2007 1757 138.6 +2.28 +1.88 1.106 52.0% +11 -27 -168 54.1% +0.25 7–8 (47%) 7–4 (64%) 101.0 +0.63 2007 1457 115.6 -1.06 -2.17 0.702 42.7% +26 — — 27.8% -1.61 1–1 0–3 (0%) — -0.62
27 2008 1834 150.3 +5.53 +1.46 1.188 53.5% -27 +6 -230 61.6% +1.10 10–13 (43%) 4–12 (25%) 93.8 -1.10 2008 1455 106.9 +3.39 +4.25 0.669 41.8% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.46
28 2009 1744 104.1 -2.58 -0.87 0.860 46.8% -28 — — 35.3% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.19 2009 1421 97.6 -0.52 -1.66 0.920 47.9% +55 -3 +137 30.4% -1.00 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +0.41
29 2010 1623 113.9 -1.08 -2.93 0.858 46.9% +1 +158 — 33.3% -1.18 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 94.3 +0.28 2010 1402 102.9 -1.39 -0.34 0.524 35.8% — — — 14.3% -2.86 0–1 0–1 — -0.12
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1407 106.9 -1.79 -0.90 0.842 46.7% +64 -4 — 31.6% -1.32 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.10
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1513 113.5 -0.88 +0.34 1.000 50.1% -12 -50 +63 52.3% -0.32 1–3 (25%) 1–0 — +0.73
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1502 102.0 -3.63 +0.69 0.868 46.6% -19 -44 — 31.3% -1.38 1–1 1–0 — -0.10
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1491 103.0 -2.87 -1.23 1.046 51.0% — — — 33.3% +0.33 0–1 — — +0.03
Career — 1852 138.0 +3.03 +1.03 1.101 51.9% -9 +24 -194 51.5% +0.22 63–72 (47%) 32–53 (38%) 91.4 +0.83 — 1648 117.4 -1.86 -0.48 0.879 47.2% +3 -19 +71 38.2% -0.88 21–35 (38%) 21–15 (58%) 102.5 -0.65

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.