H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kate Latham vs Marita Redondo H2H: 1-1

Kate Latham and Marita Redondo are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kate Latham leads 1–0 on carpet, while Marita Redondo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1979 Dallas round of 64 6-2 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kate Latham
USA Age 73
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Marita Redondo
USA Age 70

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 6-2 7-5 Marita Redondo Match data Feb 28, 1979* R64 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Marita Redondo 6-1 6-4 Kate Latham Match data Jul 1, 1972* QF Raleigh WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Marita Redondo — — — 1,901 136 118 53.5% 0 0 0 0 8 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kate Latham Marita Redondo
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1969 5–1 83.3% — 1,569 0 1
14 — — — — — — — 1970 11–4 73.3% — 1,623 0 3
15 — — — — — — — 1971 3–3 50.0% — 1,640 0 3
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1972 24–4 85.7% — 1,802 0 7
17 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0 1973 29–16 64.4% — 1,869 0 8
18 — — — — — — — 1974 2–5 28.6% — 1,772 0 8
19 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 1975 11–13 45.8% — 1,694 0 8
20 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0 1976 16–17 48.5% — 1,785 0 8
21 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,770 0 8
22 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3 1978 19–17 52.8% — 1,822 0 8
23 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3 1979 11–19 36.7% — 1,749 0 8
24 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3 1980 5–14 26.3% — 1,663 0 8
25 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3 1981 0–4 0.0% — 1,610 0 8
26 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3 — — — — — — —
27 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5 — — — — — — —
29 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5 — — — — — — —
30 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6 — — — — — — —
31 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6 — — — — — — —
32 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kate Latham Marita Redondo
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 5 1 6 83.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
16 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 10 0 10 100.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
17 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 9 4 13 69.2% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 11 6 17 64.7%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
19 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1975 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
20 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 13 11 24 54.2%
21 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1977 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
22 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1978 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 9 10 19 47.4%
23 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 11 19 42.1%
24 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4%
25 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1981 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 4 4 0.0%
26 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9% — 47 30 77 61.0% 11 14 25 44.0% 20 17 37 54.1% 51 54 105 48.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kate Latham Marita Redondo
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1969 1569 113.8 — — — — +113 — — 83.3% +2.42 — — — +1.54
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1970 1623 120.3 — — — — +139 — — 68.8% +1.94 2–2 (50%) — — +3.88
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1971 1640 107.8 — — — — — — -49 46.7% -0.13 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.5 0.00
16 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07 1972 1802 133.1 — — — — +121 -257 -90 81.7% +2.48 3–1 (75%) 3–0 (100%) 105.3 +4.96
17 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42 1973 1870 133.0 — — — — +64 -267 -112 61.6% +0.75 10–3 (77%) 2–2 (50%) 104.6 +0.66
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1772 96.7 — — — — +58 — — 33.3% -1.25 0–2 — — +0.93
19 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62 1975 1694 119.8 — — — — +67 -82 — 44.6% -0.52 5–3 (63%) 2–0 — +0.37
20 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26 1976 1786 148.4 — — — — +68 -173 — 50.0% +0.29 6–4 (60%) 2–3 (40%) 106.1 -0.82
21 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26 1977 1770 99.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — -0.09
22 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75 1978 1822 142.6 — — — — +33 — -79 51.3% -0.21 6–4 (60%) 7–1 (88%) 108.0 -0.56
23 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30 1979 1750 137.9 — — — — +41 — -40 35.9% -1.28 3–3 (50%) 3–3 (50%) 100.8 -0.40
24 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90 1980 1663 116.6 — — — — -1 — — 28.6% -1.60 2–2 (50%) 1–1 — -0.80
25 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03 1981 1611 96.4 — — — — +14 — — 0.0% -3.63 — 0–1 — +0.38
26 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44 — 1902 138.5 — — — — +60 -189 -84 52.4% +0.15 39–25 (61%) 22–12 (65%) 113.0 +4.04

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.