H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kate Latham vs Marita Redondo H2H: 1-1
Kate Latham and Marita Redondo are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kate Latham leads 1–0 on carpet, while Marita Redondo leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1979 Dallas second round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 1979* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R64 | Carpet | Kate Latham | 6-2 7-5 | Marita Redondo | Match data |
| Jul 1, 1972* | Raleigh | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Marita Redondo | 6-1 6-4 | Kate Latham | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kate Latham | — | — | — | 1,866 | 198 | 202 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Marita Redondo | — | — | — | 1,905 | 136 | 118 | 53.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kate Latham | Marita Redondo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 16 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 24–4 | 85.7% | — | 1,807 | 0 | 7 |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 29–16 | 64.4% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | 1972 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1973 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 16–17 | 48.5% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1974 | 40–16 | 71.4% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1975 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 19–17 | 52.8% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1976 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1977 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1978 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1979 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1980 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1981 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1982 | 24–28 | 46.2% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1983 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1984 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1985 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |