H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Kate Latham vs Patricia Medrado H2H: 1-0

Kate Latham holds a 1–0 lead over Patricia Medrado in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Latham leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1978 Indianapolis round of 64 6-1 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kate Latham
USA Age 74
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Patricia Medrado
BRA Age 69

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 6-1 6-4 Patricia Medrado Match data Aug 9, 1978* R64 Indianapolis WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kate Latham — — — 1,865 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Patricia Medrado — #67 9 1,837 156 164 48.8% 0 0 0 0 10 10

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kate Latham Patricia Medrado
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — 1975 3–1 75.0% — 1,535 0 0
19 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 1976 0–2 0.0% — 1,517 0 0
20 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0 1977 2–3 40.0% — 1,527 0 1
21 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3 1978 10–12 45.5% — 1,626 0 1
22 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3 1979 3–6 33.3% — 1,632 0 1
23 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3 1980 22–10 68.8% — 1,656 0 4
24 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,749 0 3 1981 38–20 65.5% — 1,740 0 8
25 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,662 0 3 1982 33–25 56.9% — 1,779 0 10
26 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,853 0 3 1983 4–18 18.2% — 1,577 0 10
27 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,750 0 4 1984 11–15 42.3% #108 1,588 0 10
28 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,775 0 5 1985 8–14 36.4% — 1,542 0 10
29 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,685 0 5 1986 12–14 46.2% #76 1,562 0 10
30 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,624 0 6 1987 6–13 31.6% #117 1,550 0 10
31 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,493 0 6 1988 4–11 26.7% #180 1,473 0 10
32 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,527 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kate Latham Patricia Medrado
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1976 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1977 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1978 7 6 13 53.8% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1979 1 1 2 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 — — — — 9 8 17 52.9% — — — — — — — —
24 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 6 5 11 54.5% 10 9 19 52.6% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1982 2 6 8 25.0% 27 9 36 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 9 12 25.0%
26 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1983 2 7 9 22.2% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0% 1984 3 5 8 37.5% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5% 1985 1 5 6 16.7% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
29 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 1986 4 6 10 40.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1987 1 4 5 20.0% 5 9 14 35.7% — — — — — — — —
31 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 1 3 4 25.0% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
Career — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9% — 29 50 79 36.7% 84 75 159 52.8% 1 9 10 10.0% 3 21 24 12.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kate Latham Patricia Medrado
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1535 102.4 — — — — — +33 — 75.0% +1.25 — — — +0.95
19 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.61 1976 1517 92.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.04
20 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26 1977 1528 97.0 — — — — +38 — — 33.3% -2.22 0–1 1–0 — +0.68
21 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.17 1978 1627 116.6 — — — — +12 -76 — 40.4% -0.75 8–2 (80%) 2–1 (67%) 109.3 +0.30
22 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.71 1979 1633 122.5 — — — — -19 -10 — 40.9% -1.45 1–3 (25%) 5–0 (100%) 101.8 -0.21
23 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.34 1980 1657 127.1 — — — — — -77 — 64.9% +1.30 6–4 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 97.7 +0.61
24 1977 1750 140.9 — — — — -8 -120 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -1.23 1981 1740 134.1 — — — — -99 -51 — 63.3% +1.20 7–7 (50%) 6–9 (40%) 96.3 +2.33
25 1978 1663 118.4 — — — — +3 -12 +67 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +1.97 1982 1780 140.9 — — — — -182 +94 — 56.6% +0.45 6–11 (35%) 7–3 (70%) 98.9 -1.80
26 1979 1853 149.7 — — — — -20 -164 -98 46.0% -0.27 8–6 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 -2.28 1983 1578 104.1 — — — — -85 +204 — 24.0% -1.80 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 94.8 +0.41
27 1980 1750 133.2 — — — — -27 — +15 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.93 1984 1589 120.4 — — — — -106 +162 — 48.3% -0.34 0–6 (0%) 5–3 (63%) 95.2 +0.35
28 1981 1776 142.9 — — — — -18 — +4 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.97 1985 1543 114.5 — — — — -89 +100 — 39.1% -0.22 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.79
29 1982 1686 128.3 — — — — +50 -103 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.20 1986 1562 123.2 — — — — -78 +112 — 49.2% +0.11 5–8 (38%) 5–2 (71%) 99.4 +0.75
30 1983 1624 115.1 — — — — +52 -49 +72 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.86 1987 1551 107.8 — — — — -104 +50 — 39.1% -0.48 2–6 (25%) 3–1 (75%) 97.0 +0.60
31 1984 1493 91.7 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.46 1988 1473 104.6 — — — — -64 +64 — 31.4% -1.20 2–3 (40%) 1–1 — +1.45
32 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1866 138.2 — — — — -3 -78 -9 49.2% -0.03 56–61 (48%) 41–38 (52%) 101.2 +0.31 — 1838 128.5 — — — — -84 +56 — 49.6% +0.05 39–57 (41%) 38–30 (56%) 96.2 +2.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.