H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kate Latham vs Raquel Giscafre H2H: 1-0

Kate Latham holds a 1–0 lead over Raquel Giscafre in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Latham leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1979 Beckenham round of 32 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kate Latham
USA Age 73
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Raquel Giscafre
ARG Age 77

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 6-2 6-2 Raquel Giscafre Match data Jun 7, 1979* R32 Beckenham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Raquel Giscafre — — — 1,798 86 120 41.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kate Latham Raquel Giscafre
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 1968 5–8 38.5% — 1,494 0 0
20 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0 1969 9–15 37.5% — 1,489 0 0
21 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3 1970 3–2 60.0% — 1,504 0 0
22 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3 1971 5–13 27.8% — 1,467 0 0
23 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3 1972 6–16 27.3% — 1,488 0 0
24 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3 1973 11–11 50.0% — 1,605 0 1
25 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3 1974 26–17 60.5% — 1,743 0 3
26 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3 1975 15–18 45.5% — 1,727 0 4
27 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4 1976 2–3 40.0% — 1,710 0 4
28 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5 1977 2–6 25.0% — 1,658 0 4
29 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5 1978 1–8 11.1% — 1,558 0 4
30 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6 1979 1–1 50.0% — 1,564 0 4
31 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6 1980 0–2 0.0% — 1,538 0 4
32 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kate Latham Raquel Giscafre
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1968 — — — — 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
20 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1969 — — — — 9 14 23 39.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
21 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1970 — — — — 3 1 4 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
22 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1971 — — — — 3 8 11 27.3% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
23 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 1 6 7 14.3% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — —
24 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1974 1 1 2 50.0% 21 8 29 72.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1975 1 5 6 16.7% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
27 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0% 1976 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5% 1977 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
30 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
31 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9% — 3 10 13 23.1% 67 66 133 50.4% 11 33 44 25.0% 5 9 14 35.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kate Latham Raquel Giscafre
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62 1968 1495 94.8 — — — — — -8 — 36.0% -1.24 0–1 — — -0.01
20 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26 1969 1490 111.5 — — — — — -2 — 40.4% -0.28 0–1 — — +1.55
21 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26 1970 1505 104.3 — — — — — +28 — 60.0% +1.10 — — — +1.15
22 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75 1971 1468 99.0 — — — — — +19 -2 32.4% -1.76 1–3 (25%) — — +1.07
23 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30 1972 1489 108.6 — — — — +89 -52 -8 31.8% -1.61 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.68
24 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90 1973 1606 135.2 — — — — — +16 -154 52.5% +0.58 1–1 — — +1.95
25 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03 1974 1743 135.9 — — — — -177 +93 -250 59.1% +0.59 8–5 (62%) 4–2 (67%) 106.5 +0.72
26 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22 1975 1728 134.7 — — — — -62 +89 — 47.3% -0.26 3–7 (30%) 1–3 (25%) 94.6 +0.32
27 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81 1976 1711 111.5 — — — — — +86 — 40.0% -0.70 — — — -0.40
28 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96 1977 1658 103.2 — — — — — +95 — 27.8% -1.61 1–1 0–1 — -0.01
29 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31 1978 1559 95.5 — — — — — — -163 21.1% -1.95 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61
30 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84 1979 1565 101.2 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — +0.11
31 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50 1980 1539 91.4 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.25 — — — -0.22
32 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44 — 1798 123.7 — — — — -73 +40 -101 43.7% -0.47 18–23 (44%) 7–8 (47%) 98.7 +3.08

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.