H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kate Latham vs Yvonne Vermaak H2H: 0-2
Yvonne Vermaak holds a 2–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yvonne Vermaak leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Yvonne Vermaak won the 1982 Boston third round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 73
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 69
Right-Handed
155 cm / 5'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 1982* | Boston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Yvonne Vermaak | 6-1 6-3 | Kate Latham | Match data |
| Mar 16, 1978* | Boston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Yvonne Vermaak | 6-1 6-3 | Kate Latham | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kate Latham | — | — | — | 1,866 | 198 | 202 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Yvonne Vermaak | #558 | #38 | 10 | 1,891 | 239 | 249 | 49.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kate Latham | Yvonne Vermaak | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1969 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1970 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1972 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 8–10 | 44.4% | — | 1,607 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1973 | 6–7 | 46.2% | — | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 20–14 | 58.8% | — | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1974 | 40–16 | 71.4% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 29–23 | 55.8% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1975 | 15–20 | 42.9% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 15–23 | 39.5% | — | 1,781 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1976 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 19–18 | 51.4% | — | 1,740 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1977 | 15–12 | 55.6% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 19–28 | 40.4% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1978 | 13–17 | 43.3% | — | 1,661 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 36–27 | 57.1% | — | 1,819 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1979 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,848 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 33–26 | 55.9% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1980 | 23–22 | 51.1% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 29–28 | 50.9% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 1981 | 21–20 | 51.2% | — | 1,774 | 0 | 5 | 1985 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #41 | 1,605 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 1982 | 24–28 | 46.2% | — | 1,688 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #104 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 1983 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 6 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #201 | 1,558 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 1984 | 0–11 | 0.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 6 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #287 | 1,542 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | 1985 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |