H2H data updated: 2026-10-28 00:00 UTC

Kate Latham vs Yvonne Vermaak H2H: 0-2

Yvonne Vermaak holds a 2–0 lead over Kate Latham in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Yvonne Vermaak leads 2–0 on carpet. Most recently, Yvonne Vermaak won the 1982 Boston round of 32 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kate Latham
USA Age 74
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Yvonne Vermaak
RSA Age 69 Right-Handed 155 cm / 5'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Yvonne Vermaak 6-1 6-3 Kate Latham Match data Mar 18, 1982* R32 Boston WTA 250 Carpet
Yvonne Vermaak 6-1 6-3 Kate Latham Match data Mar 16, 1978* R32 Boston WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kate Latham — — — 1,865 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Yvonne Vermaak — #38 10 1,892 239 250 48.9% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kate Latham Yvonne Vermaak
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0 1973 0–2 0.0% — 1,495 0 0
17 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0 1974 1–2 33.3% — 1,489 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1975 15–12 55.6% — 1,599 0 0
19 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0 1976 8–10 44.4% — 1,606 0 1
20 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0 1977 20–14 58.8% — 1,765 0 2
21 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3 1978 29–23 55.8% — 1,794 0 2
22 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3 1979 15–23 39.5% — 1,781 0 2
23 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3 1980 19–19 50.0% — 1,735 0 2
24 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,749 0 3 1981 19–28 40.4% — 1,720 0 2
25 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,662 0 3 1982 36–27 57.1% — 1,821 0 2
26 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,853 0 3 1983 33–26 55.9% — 1,755 0 4
27 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,750 0 4 1984 29–28 50.9% #41 1,801 0 5
28 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,775 0 5 1985 8–21 27.6% — 1,605 0 5
29 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,685 0 5 1986 6–11 35.3% #104 1,565 0 5
30 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,624 0 6 1987 1–3 25.0% #201 1,558 0 5
31 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,493 0 6 1988 0–1 0.0% #287 1,542 0 5
32 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,527 0 6 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kate Latham Yvonne Vermaak
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1974 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 4 3 7 57.1% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — —
19 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — 1976 1 1 2 50.0% 7 6 13 53.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 1977 3 2 5 60.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
21 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0% 1978 13 7 20 65.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
22 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1979 4 6 10 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 2 9 11 18.2%
23 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 2 5 7 28.6% 9 5 14 64.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4%
24 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1981 7 9 16 43.8% 11 9 20 55.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 9 10 10.0%
25 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 1982 4 4 8 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 10 10 20 50.0%
26 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5% 1983 14 4 18 77.8% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 9 13 30.8%
27 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0% 1984 12 7 19 63.2% 7 8 15 46.7% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 7 9 22.2%
28 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5% 1985 5 8 13 38.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
29 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8% 1986 1 2 3 33.3% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
31 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1988 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9% — 72 64 136 52.9% 78 72 150 52.0% 55 44 99 55.6% 33 69 102 32.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kate Latham Yvonne Vermaak
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07 1973 1496 101.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -3.20 0–1 — — -0.39
17 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42 1974 1489 99.2 — — — — +43 — — 42.9% -0.71 0–1 — — +0.69
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1975 1599 120.1 — — — — +53 -2 -47 57.1% +0.46 3–6 (33%) 3–0 (100%) 100.2 +2.23
19 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.61 1976 1607 119.9 — — — — -10 +39 — 48.8% +0.09 2–5 (29%) 1–3 (25%) — +0.77
20 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26 1977 1766 138.3 — — — — -80 -80 -75 58.1% +0.41 3–3 (50%) 6–5 (55%) 102.5 -0.04
21 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.17 1978 1794 135.9 — — — — +3 -135 -32 52.6% +0.33 8–6 (57%) 2–6 (25%) 99.2 +2.36
22 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.71 1979 1781 155.4 — — — — -43 -75 +23 40.5% -0.50 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 99.0 -4.15
23 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.34 1980 1735 137.1 — — — — -93 +40 +57 51.2% +0.13 2–4 (33%) 4–3 (57%) 99.6 -4.28
24 1977 1750 140.9 — — — — -8 -120 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -1.23 1981 1720 144.0 — — — — -67 +97 — 43.1% -0.39 4–6 (40%) 1–5 (17%) 97.0 -2.56
25 1978 1663 118.4 — — — — +3 -12 +67 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +1.97 1982 1821 143.1 — — — — -78 +69 -9 55.2% +0.06 11–10 (52%) 9–10 (47%) 99.9 -2.99
26 1979 1853 149.7 — — — — -20 -164 -98 46.0% -0.27 8–6 (57%) 4–4 (50%) 103.8 -2.28 1983 1755 138.2 — — — — +8 +105 +98 55.4% +0.20 10–11 (48%) 7–3 (70%) 100.1 +1.01
27 1980 1750 133.2 — — — — -27 — +15 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.93 1984 1801 135.0 — — — — -65 -14 +95 53.1% +0.15 5–11 (31%) 7–8 (47%) 94.0 -0.27
28 1981 1776 142.9 — — — — -18 — +4 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.97 1985 1605 125.4 — — — — +12 +115 +210 37.7% -0.97 1–10 (9%) 0–1 — -0.88
29 1982 1686 128.3 — — — — +50 -103 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.20 1986 1566 105.2 — — — — +20 +85 +195 36.8% -0.87 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — -0.31
30 1983 1624 115.1 — — — — +52 -49 +72 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.86 1987 1559 108.1 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.38 — — — -0.55
31 1984 1493 91.7 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.46 1988 1542 94.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.11
32 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1866 138.2 — — — — -3 -78 -9 49.2% -0.03 56–61 (48%) 41–38 (52%) 101.2 +0.31 — 1893 142.0 — — — — -34 +34 +34 50.0% -0.06 55–80 (41%) 41–47 (47%) 93.2 -1.90

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.