H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Kateryna Volodko vs Anna-Lena Groenefeld H2H: 2-0
Kateryna Volodko holds a 2–0 lead over Anna-Lena Groenefeld in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kateryna Volodko leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kateryna Volodko won the 2009 Tokyo second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Age 39
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 30, 2009* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Kateryna Volodko | 6-3 6-1 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
| Mar 1, 2007* | Doha | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Kateryna Volodko | 7-5 4-6 6-3 | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kateryna Volodko | #584 | #29 | 1,740 | 1,801 | 137 | 187 | 42.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Anna-Lena Groenefeld | #1,012 | #14 | 1,365 | 1,856 | 109 | 130 | 45.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kateryna Volodko | Anna-Lena Groenefeld | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2003 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #384 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #118 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2004 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #316 | 1,470 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #68 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #21 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #100 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #19 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 2007 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #44 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #204 | 1,527 | 0 | 1 |
| 2008 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #62 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #76 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 |
| 2009 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #31 | 1,769 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 18–23 | 43.9% | #65 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 2010 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #99 | 1,665 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #166 | 1,563 | 0 | 1 |
| 2011 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #85 | 1,719 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #266 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 2012 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #136 | 1,659 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,619 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #89 | 1,606 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #69 | 1,673 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #92 | 1,653 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #132 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1168 | 1,537 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #285 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #207 | 1,530 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,550 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2024 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #584 | 1,541 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |