H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kateryna Volodko vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 1-3

Nadia Petrova holds a 3–1 lead over Kateryna Volodko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kateryna Volodko leads 1–0 on carpet, while Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2012 Brussels third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kateryna Volodko
UKR Age 39 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main draw meetings
Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 24, 2012* Brussels WTA 500 R32 Clay Nadia Petrova #29 6-4 6-4 Kateryna Volodko #63 Match data
Jun 26, 2011* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Nadia Petrova #37 6-3 6-2 Kateryna Volodko #126 Match data
Oct 23, 2008* Linz WTA 500 R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #13 3-6 6-3 6-1 Kateryna Volodko #62 Match data
Feb 7, 2008* Paris WTA 500 R32 Carpet Kateryna Volodko #43 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 Nadia Petrova #11 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kateryna Volodko #584 #29 1,740 1,801 137 187 42.3% 0 0 0 1 1 2
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kateryna Volodko Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2003 1–2 33.3% #384 1,493 0 0 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 2004 0–2 0.0% #316 1,470 0 0 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0
18 2005 7–7 50.0% #121 1,536 0 0 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2006 5–10 33.3% #100 1,530 0 0 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2007 13–19 40.6% #44 1,630 0 0 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0
21 2008 15–18 45.5% #62 1,646 0 1 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0
22 2009 23–20 53.5% #31 1,769 0 1 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0
23 2010 8–15 34.8% #99 1,665 0 1 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1
24 2011 14–10 58.3% #85 1,719 0 1 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6
25 2012 7–11 38.9% #136 1,659 0 1 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7
26 — — — — — — — 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9
27 2014 0–2 0.0% #201 1,619 0 1 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
28 2015 8–14 36.4% #89 1,606 0 1 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 2016 14–17 45.2% #69 1,673 0 1 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 2017 13–14 48.1% #92 1,653 0 2 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 2018 3–11 21.4% #132 1,568 0 2 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 2019 0–2 0.0% #1168 1,537 0 2 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13
33 2020 5–8 38.5% #285 1,510 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2021 1–2 33.3% #207 1,530 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2023 0–2 0.0% #276 1,550 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2024 0–1 0.0% #584 1,541 0 2 — — — — — — —