H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kateryna Volodko vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 1-3

Nadia Petrova holds a 3–1 lead over Kateryna Volodko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kateryna Volodko leads 1–0 on carpet, while Nadia Petrova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2012 Brussels round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kateryna Volodko
UKR Age 40 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 3
4 main-draw meetings
Nadia Petrova
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nadia Petrova #29 6-4 6-4 Kateryna Volodko #63 Match data May 24, 2012* R32 Brussels Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay
Nadia Petrova #37 6-3 6-2 Kateryna Volodko #126 Match data Jun 26, 2011* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Nadia Petrova #13 3-6 6-3 6-1 Kateryna Volodko #62 Match data Oct 23, 2008* R32 Linz Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Kateryna Volodko #43 7-6(4) 3-6 6-4 Nadia Petrova #11 Match data Feb 7, 2008* R32 Paris Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kateryna Volodko #584 #29 1,740 1,802 138 190 42.1% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,089 444 278 61.5% 0 3 1 5 4 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kateryna Volodko Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 2003 1–2 33.3% #384 1,493 0 0 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 2004 0–2 0.0% #316 1,470 0 0 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,567 0 0
18 2005 7–7 50.0% #121 1,535 0 0 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2006 5–10 33.3% #100 1,530 0 0 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2007 13–19 40.6% #44 1,622 0 0 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,745 0 0
21 2008 15–19 44.1% #62 1,640 0 1 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,921 0 0
22 2009 23–20 53.5% #31 1,770 0 1 2004 40–25 61.5% #12 1,879 0 0
23 2010 8–15 34.8% #99 1,666 0 1 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,971 0 1
24 2011 14–10 58.3% #85 1,720 0 1 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,999 0 6
25 2012 7–12 36.8% #136 1,656 0 1 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,918 0 7
26 — — — — — — — 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,925 0 9
27 2014 0–2 0.0% #201 1,616 0 1 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,824 0 9
28 2015 8–14 36.4% #89 1,605 0 1 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,852 0 9
29 2016 14–17 45.2% #69 1,673 0 1 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,786 0 10
30 2017 13–14 48.1% #92 1,652 0 2 2012 39–19 67.2% #12 1,933 0 13
31 2018 4–12 25.0% #132 1,587 0 2 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,725 0 13
32 2019 0–2 0.0% #1168 1,554 0 2 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,656 0 13
33 2020 5–8 38.5% #285 1,519 0 2 — — — — — — —
34 2021 1–2 33.3% #207 1,534 0 2 — — — — — — —
36 2023 0–2 0.0% #276 1,553 0 2 — — — — — — —
37 2024 0–1 0.0% #584 1,543 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kateryna Volodko Nadia Petrova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 2003 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
17 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
18 2005 6 3 9 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2000 8 5 13 61.5% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 2006 4 6 10 40.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2001 8 11 19 42.1% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 2007 8 11 19 42.1% 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2002 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0%
21 2008 4 12 16 25.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7% 2003 20 11 31 64.5% 9 4 13 69.2% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 3 5 40.0%
22 2009 12 12 24 50.0% 9 6 15 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2004 28 16 44 63.6% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
23 2010 7 12 19 36.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2005 34 17 51 66.7% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 2011 7 6 13 53.8% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2006 28 16 44 63.6% 15 1 16 93.8% — — — — 5 2 7 71.4%
25 2012 3 4 7 42.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 2007 20 11 31 64.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 4 0 4 100.0%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 34 17 51 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 8 2 10 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 2014 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 17 13 30 56.7% 9 6 15 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
28 2015 7 10 17 41.2% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 17 14 31 54.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2016 8 11 19 42.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2011 18 13 31 58.1% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 2017 9 9 18 50.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2012 20 11 31 64.5% 10 6 16 62.5% 9 2 11 81.8% — — — —
31 2018 2 6 8 25.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2013 7 7 14 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
32 2019 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2020 5 6 11 45.5% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 84 117 201 41.8% 35 53 88 39.8% 17 19 36 47.2% 2 1 3 66.7% — 264 170 434 60.8% 107 62 169 63.3% 51 28 79 64.6% 22 18 40 55.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 282/323 of Kateryna Volodko's and 414/630 of Nadia Petrova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kateryna Volodko Nadia Petrova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2005 4/14 4.3 4.8 51.4% 66.4% 43.7% 52.6% 32.1% 55.4% 39.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2006 8/15 3.0 6.1 54.5% 61.2% 47.5% 44.5% 48.0% 54.8% 42.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2007 27/32 2.7 4.6 57.4% 63.9% 44.4% 57.8% 50.6% 55.6% 43.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2008 33/34 2.4 3.7 57.4% 64.2% 46.1% 49.9% 47.7% 56.6% 40.0% 2003 12/56 3.7 3.3 56.6% 70.3% 47.3% 61.6% 49.4% 60.0% 51.0%
22 2009 41/43 2.0 3.5 63.5% 62.3% 44.6% 49.5% 49.1% 55.7% 43.8% 2004 10/65 4.7 4.2 56.8% 69.4% 49.1% 44.6% 40.1% 60.7% 44.9%
23 2010 21/23 2.7 4.4 60.6% 59.9% 41.6% 45.5% 43.5% 52.7% 43.1% 2005 22/81 3.9 3.4 60.3% 69.7% 48.9% 61.7% 50.8% 61.3% 47.2%
24 2011 23/24 1.5 3.8 64.8% 62.4% 43.3% 53.4% 60.9% 56.0% 46.7% 2006 50/67 5.1 2.7 61.5% 71.4% 51.1% 58.4% 48.2% 63.7% 47.6%
25 2012 17/19 1.7 6.8 64.1% 61.2% 35.3% 50.6% 44.1% 51.9% 42.7% 2007 49/55 4.4 3.1 61.8% 71.9% 48.2% 58.1% 47.0% 62.6% 45.1%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 63/71 4.7 3.7 60.3% 70.4% 44.7% 57.0% 53.9% 60.4% 45.5%
27 2014 2/2 0.5 6.0 63.1% 68.8% 28.9% 54.5% 49.2% 53.9% 42.4% 2009 47/51 6.2 3.7 58.3% 70.3% 46.5% 50.8% 44.7% 60.2% 42.2%
28 2015 14/22 1.5 5.3 69.1% 62.2% 47.4% 59.2% 56.9% 57.6% 39.7% 2010 47/52 6.2 3.3 57.1% 71.5% 48.2% 63.1% 51.9% 61.5% 43.1%
29 2016 31/31 2.5 4.5 64.8% 62.1% 43.6% 51.6% 52.0% 55.3% 44.4% 2011 41/46 4.2 3.0 58.5% 66.6% 48.1% 55.9% 52.2% 59.1% 42.1%
30 2017 26/27 2.5 5.1 62.8% 62.7% 43.7% 47.0% 57.8% 55.6% 45.0% 2012 45/58 6.0 3.0 55.3% 70.5% 46.7% 51.0% 48.8% 60.0% 44.4%
31 2018 14/16 2.1 5.7 60.0% 60.4% 41.8% 50.4% 40.5% 53.0% 39.3% 2013 22/22 6.3 3.0 60.4% 67.2% 41.1% 51.9% 43.8% 57.1% 44.5%
32 2019 2/2 2.5 7.5 48.6% 58.1% 32.0% 37.5% 34.1% 44.6% 41.0% 2014 6/6 5.3 5.5 46.7% 66.9% 45.9% 48.3% 39.9% 54.2% 42.2%
33 2020 13/13 2.1 6.0 59.6% 64.5% 40.3% 55.8% 53.2% 54.5% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 3/3 2.0 3.3 58.4% 51.7% 41.3% 47.5% 33.2% 47.4% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 2/2 0.0 5.0 61.7% 54.7% 35.4% 54.2% 69.0% 47.4% 38.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1/1 1.0 5.0 60.3% 70.5% 65.5% 60.0% 25.0% 68.5% 31.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 282/328 2.2 4.6 61.5% 62.4% 43.3% 51.1% 50.1% 55.0% 42.8% — 414/722 5.2 3.3 58.9% 70.2% 47.3% 56.2% 49.0% 60.8% 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kateryna Volodko Nadia Petrova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 2003 1493 99.7 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.00 — 0–1 — +0.13 1998 1536 108.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 2–0 1–1 — -0.21
17 2004 1470 92.7 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — 0–1 — -0.06 1999 1568 119.8 — — — — +27 — — 38.9% -1.06 1–1 1–0 — -0.10
18 2005 1535 114.5 -0.65 -1.39 0.888 47.3% +53 -74 — 48.4% 0.00 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 101.2 +0.22 2000 1625 137.4 — — — — +80 -140 -67 48.4% +0.27 4–8 (33%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 -0.47
19 2006 1530 109.9 -0.47 -1.41 0.933 48.7% +34 -81 — 39.4% -0.76 2–3 (40%) 1–2 (33%) — +0.19 2001 1683 138.0 — — — — -59 -20 -54 49.4% +0.35 5–6 (45%) 2–11 (15%) 96.0 -0.89
20 2007 1623 134.3 -0.20 +0.29 0.974 49.7% -9 -92 — 40.5% -0.53 6–6 (50%) 3–5 (38%) 102.9 -1.23 2002 1745 137.3 — — — — -48 — — 59.1% +0.68 1–1 1–1 — -1.69
21 2008 1641 129.4 +1.11 -2.53 0.922 48.7% -55 -111 +64 44.9% -0.41 5–5 (50%) 5–4 (56%) 101.4 -0.94 2003 1922 156.8 +3.29 +4.32 1.277 55.5% -51 -85 -174 61.1% +0.92 11–9 (55%) 6–2 (75%) 105.2 -2.56
22 2009 1771 139.2 +0.57 +0.61 0.989 49.9% -80 -106 -46 53.5% +0.09 8–7 (53%) 8–3 (73%) 107.1 -0.90 2004 1880 151.4 +3.04 +0.66 1.141 52.4% +11 -49 -143 61.4% +1.02 8–11 (42%) 7–7 (50%) 95.7 +1.78
23 2010 1667 123.1 -2.00 -0.23 0.911 47.7% -7 -36 — 37.5% -0.85 2–4 (33%) 2–5 (29%) 96.2 -0.17 2005 1971 156.3 +4.70 +2.81 1.221 54.3% -26 +29 -176 69.4% +1.41 13–10 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 102.6 +1.08
24 2011 1721 131.2 +0.20 +2.11 1.061 51.5% -32 -47 -19 62.0% +0.92 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -1.37 2006 1999 165.0 +7.12 +3.75 1.310 55.6% -34 +105 — 70.3% +1.75 9–6 (60%) 7–4 (64%) 102.2 +2.64
25 2012 1656 118.5 -1.96 -0.33 0.888 47.3% +28 -33 +55 36.4% -0.91 4–2 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 101.9 -1.12 2007 1918 152.6 +6.15 +2.04 1.205 53.8% +19 +124 -43 68.2% +1.44 9–3 (75%) 7–7 (50%) 101.3 -0.25
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1926 146.0 +4.49 +1.77 1.149 53.0% -16 +1 +21 66.9% +1.29 7–11 (39%) 9–5 (64%) 94.7 +0.54
27 2014 1617 101.3 -2.50 -3.04 0.919 47.8% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–2 — — +0.07 2009 1825 141.7 +4.11 -1.32 1.060 51.1% +14 +37 +87 54.4% +0.50 14–8 (64%) 8–6 (57%) 100.8 +1.28
28 2015 1605 129.5 -0.14 -0.79 0.935 49.1% +30 -35 — 40.8% -0.22 3–4 (43%) 1–7 (13%) 94.1 -1.36 2010 1853 154.1 +4.92 +0.47 1.120 52.6% -39 +99 +61 62.1% +0.91 10–8 (56%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 -0.43
29 2016 1673 127.0 -0.24 +0.59 0.993 49.8% +20 -110 +22 44.9% -0.05 9–7 (56%) 3–6 (33%) 98.5 -1.35 2011 1787 136.6 +2.64 -0.57 1.028 50.6% -5 +48 +103 56.6% +0.32 5–6 (45%) 8–5 (62%) 97.5 +0.59
30 2017 1653 121.1 -0.88 +1.50 1.012 50.3% +65 -155 — 48.3% -0.15 3–7 (30%) 2–4 (33%) 95.5 +1.05 2012 1933 142.8 +3.66 +1.17 1.111 52.0% -27 -100 +6 63.6% +0.94 13–6 (68%) 8–9 (47%) 102.3 +2.25
31 2018 1587 117.1 -1.92 -1.90 0.835 46.5% +93 -154 +97 34.2% -0.89 3–5 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 100.9 -0.30 2013 1725 130.0 +1.40 +0.62 1.039 50.4% +95 +39 — 44.2% +0.10 3–5 (38%) 1–4 (20%) 94.3 +0.77
32 2019 1555 96.1 -2.89 -0.91 0.739 42.9% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — 0–1 — +0.17 2014 1656 109.1 -1.13 -0.85 0.922 47.9% +85 — — 30.8% -1.15 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — -0.14
33 2020 1520 114.3 -2.12 -1.71 0.910 48.5% +80 — — 38.7% -0.32 3–2 (60%) 1–4 (20%) 98.3 +0.76 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2021 1535 102.9 -0.85 -0.91 0.710 42.6% — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 — — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2022 1550 102.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2023 1553 107.2 -1.05 +0.97 0.736 44.2% — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — -0.28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2024 1543 102.6 -0.34 -0.32 1.010 48.4% — — — 33.3% -1.00 0–1 — — +0.29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1802 130.3 -0.44 -0.15 0.950 49.0% +5 -92 +35 44.0% -0.33 52–60 (46%) 33–52 (39%) 94.5 -1.88 — 2089 155.3 +4.43 +1.25 1.140 52.7% -11 +13 -35 61.1% +0.92 116–101 (53%) 76–78 (49%) 96.4 +0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.