H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel vs Adriana Villagran Reami H2H: 1-0
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel holds a 1–0 lead over Adriana Villagran Reami in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1984 Indianapolis third round 5-7 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 7, 1984* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | 5-7 6-1 6-4 | Adriana Villagran Reami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Adriana Villagran Reami | — | — | — | 1,597 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Adriana Villagran Reami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,470 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,462 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 | 1984 | 10–11 | 47.6% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 | 1985 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 | 1986 | 13–25 | 34.2% | — | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 13–21 | 38.2% | — | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | 1988 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 2–12 | 14.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,432 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |