H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel vs Pam Casale H2H: 7-3

Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel holds a 7–3 lead over Pam Casale in their WTA head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel leads 3–1 on carpet, while they are tied 2–2 on hard courts. Most recently, Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel won the 1986 Houston semifinal 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel
USA Age 59 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"
H2H
7 – 3
10 main-draw meetings
Pam Casale
USA Age 62 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 6-4 6-4 Pam Casale #55 Match data May 10, 1986* SF Houston WTA 250 Clay
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 6-2 6-4 Pam Casale #57 Match data Apr 18, 1986* R16 Amelia Island WTA 250 Clay
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 6-4 7-5 Pam Casale #52 Match data Mar 12, 1986* R64 Dallas WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Casale 6-4 4-6 6-4 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data Oct 12, 1985* SF Indianapolis 2 WTA 250 Hard
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 6-3 6-2 Pam Casale Match data Aug 16, 1985* R16 Mahwah WTA 250 Hard
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 7-5 6-4 Pam Casale #15 Match data Jan 7, 1985 R16 Washington Open WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Casale #24 6-2 6-2 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data Mar 30, 1984* R16 Boston WTA 250 Carpet
Pam Casale 6-3 3-6 7-6 Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Match data Nov 12, 1983* QF Deerfield Beach WTA 250 Hard
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 6-2 6-7 6-3 Pam Casale Match data Nov 17, 1981 RR Johannesburg Indoors WTA 250 Carpet
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel 3-6 6-3 6-1 Pam Casale Match data Oct 17, 1981* SF Tokyo Borden WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel — #9 — 2,082 277 213 56.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Pam Casale #671 #14 22 1,944 168 147 53.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Pam Casale
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1980 4–5 44.4% — 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
14 1981 27–14 65.9% — 1,802 0 2 — — — — — — —
15 1982 30–19 61.2% — 1,872 0 2 — — — — — — —
16 1983 29–17 63.0% — 1,844 0 2 1980 15–10 60.0% — 1,597 0 0
17 1984 27–19 58.7% — 1,851 0 2 1981 30–17 63.8% — 1,810 0 0
18 1985 41–16 71.9% — 1,975 0 3 1982 20–23 46.5% — 1,745 0 0
19 1986 34–16 68.0% #9 1,974 0 4 1983 23–20 53.5% — 1,770 0 0
20 1987 15–8 65.2% — 1,901 0 4 1984 31–17 64.6% #15 1,914 0 0
21 1988 5–8 38.5% — 1,811 0 4 1985 24–20 54.5% #14 1,814 0 0
22 1989 16–15 51.6% — 1,788 0 4 1986 16–17 48.5% #41 1,787 0 0
23 1990 15–18 45.5% — 1,697 0 4 1987 5–11 31.2% #111 1,673 0 0
24 1991 7–15 31.8% — 1,589 0 4 1988 4–10 28.6% #169 1,552 0 0
25 1992 10–15 40.0% — 1,586 0 4 1989 0–1 0.0% #225 1,547 0 0
26 1993 12–13 48.0% — 1,628 0 4 1990 0–1 0.0% #554 1,525 0 0
27 1994 1–5 16.7% — 1,585 0 4 — — — — — — —
28 1995 1–2 33.3% — 1,609 0 4 — — — — — — —
29 1996 3–8 27.3% — 1,554 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Pam Casale
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
13 1980 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 14 6 20 70.0% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 7 3 10 70.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 6 8 14 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 8 5 13 61.5% 18 7 25 72.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1980 8 7 15 53.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1984 6 3 9 66.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 1981 17 6 23 73.9% 7 5 12 58.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 3 5 40.0%
18 1985 15 5 20 75.0% 9 4 13 69.2% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 2 4 50.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
19 1986 7 4 11 63.6% 12 4 16 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 15 6 21 71.4% 1983 5 5 10 50.0% 13 8 21 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
20 1987 5 2 7 71.4% 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% 1984 8 3 11 72.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 6 17 64.7%
21 1988 4 5 9 44.4% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1985 17 7 24 70.8% 4 5 9 44.4% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
22 1989 8 7 15 53.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1986 3 6 9 33.3% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
23 1990 11 10 21 52.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1987 3 5 8 37.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
24 1991 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1988 3 6 9 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 1992 5 8 13 38.5% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1989 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1993 5 7 12 41.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1990 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 1994 0 3 3 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1995 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 99 84 183 54.1% 98 59 157 62.4% 27 24 51 52.9% 49 43 92 53.3% — 66 49 115 57.4% 55 41 96 57.3% 15 19 34 44.1% 25 35 60 41.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel Pam Casale
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1980 1505 105.8 — — — — — — — 42.1% -0.42 1–0 1–1 — -0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
14 1981 1803 134.8 — — — — -10 -130 -221 61.5% +1.17 9–5 (64%) 3–3 (50%) 105.4 +2.37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1982 1872 149.0 — — — — -69 -6 -215 60.4% +0.54 6–4 (60%) 7–2 (78%) 107.8 -4.11 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1983 1845 139.2 — — — — -45 +103 -185 58.6% +0.96 12–7 (63%) 1–7 (13%) 99.3 +3.06 1980 1598 118.7 — — — — +29 — — 57.4% +0.72 3–3 (50%) 1–1 — +2.02
17 1984 1851 137.1 — — — — -38 +58 -143 55.9% +0.22 9–5 (64%) 3–1 (75%) 103.9 +0.60 1981 1811 140.3 — — — — -1 -153 -196 64.1% +1.03 3–6 (33%) 6–0 (100%) 101.9 +1.97
18 1985 1976 158.8 — — — — -30 -57 -101 70.6% +1.53 9–2 (82%) 3–5 (38%) 105.7 -2.76 1982 1745 140.3 — — — — -54 -4 -106 50.5% +0.01 1–8 (11%) 9–5 (64%) 95.5 -3.37
19 1986 1975 157.9 — — — — -2 +51 — 63.6% +1.08 8–6 (57%) 7–6 (54%) 101.3 -3.03 1983 1770 144.1 — — — — -55 +93 -103 52.1% +0.47 5–3 (63%) 3–3 (50%) 102.6 -1.57
20 1987 1902 131.1 — — — — +35 +51 — 61.4% +0.60 7–4 (64%) 4–1 (80%) 100.0 -0.03 1984 1914 155.3 — — — — +6 -60 -210 64.8% +1.01 3–6 (33%) 7–3 (70%) 100.3 -2.46
21 1988 1812 123.2 — — — — +51 — — 44.4% -0.67 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -1.23 1985 1814 137.6 — — — — +80 -54 -188 53.1% +0.34 6–4 (60%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.08
22 1989 1788 141.2 — — — — +17 +110 -20 50.0% -0.29 7–3 (70%) 3–1 (75%) 103.8 -4.08 1986 1788 137.1 — — — — -56 +52 — 46.8% -0.18 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 103.7 -3.63
23 1990 1698 132.2 — — — — +65 +102 — 44.7% -0.36 8–4 (67%) 2–2 (50%) 101.6 +0.06 1987 1673 114.3 — — — — -20 — -77 41.7% -0.56 3–5 (38%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.50
24 1991 1590 119.7 — — — — +56 +172 — 36.7% -0.67 3–4 (43%) 0–5 (0%) 93.8 +0.93 1988 1552 100.5 — — — — +25 +207 — 36.4% -0.79 1–4 (20%) 1–2 (33%) 92.4 +1.01
25 1992 1586 115.2 — — — — -5 +158 +152 45.2% -0.50 4–8 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 92.9 +1.34 1989 1547 93.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.21
26 1993 1629 119.3 — — — — -57 +111 — 45.9% -0.25 7–4 (64%) 1–4 (20%) 101.8 +0.90 1990 1526 90.6 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.21
27 1994 1586 107.2 — — — — -57 — — 21.4% -2.00 1–1 — — -0.20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1995 1609 114.1 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.60 1–0 1–0 — -0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1996 1555 105.6 — — — — -34 +118 +211 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 94.7 +0.42 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2083 145.9 — — — — -6 +45 -86 55.0% +0.38 95–63 (60%) 41–44 (48%) 102.1 -1.30 — 1944 143.5 — — — — +1 +5 -153 53.9% +0.36 32–43 (43%) 38–21 (64%) 100.1 -2.42

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.