H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 14:15 UTC
Katie Boulter vs Caroline Garcia H2H: 1-0
Katie Boulter holds a 1–0 lead over Caroline Garcia in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Katie Boulter leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Katie Boulter won the 2022 Birmingham fourth round 7-6(5) 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 29
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 32
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2022* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Katie Boulter | 7-6(5) 6-1 | Caroline Garcia | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katie Boulter | #67 | #23 | 1,931 | 1,861 | 93 | 90 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Caroline Garcia | #452 | #4 | 5,170 | 2,008 | 335 | 263 | 56.0% | 0 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katie Boulter | Caroline Garcia | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #142 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #154 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #74 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #37 | 1,669 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2018 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #97 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #34 | 1,711 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #319 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #24 | 1,763 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #365 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #8 | 1,969 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2021 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #149 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #19 | 1,917 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2022 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #136 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 24–25 | 49.0% | #46 | 1,694 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2023 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #56 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2020 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #43 | 1,735 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2024 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #24 | 1,833 | 0 | 3 | 2021 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #74 | 1,700 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #106 | 1,753 | 0 | 3 | 2022 | 44–20 | 68.8% | #4 | 1,988 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2026 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #67 | 1,793 | 0 | 4 | 2023 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #20 | 1,831 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #48 | 1,797 | 0 | 11 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #304 | 1,745 | 0 | 11 |