H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 16:32 UTC
Katie Boulter vs Lesia Tsurenko H2H: 1-2
Lesia Tsurenko holds a 2–1 lead over Katie Boulter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lesia Tsurenko leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Lesia Tsurenko won the 2024 Wuhan second round 6-2 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GBR
Age 29
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 37
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2024* | Wuhan | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Lesia Tsurenko | 6-2 7-5 | Katie Boulter | Match data |
| Feb 29, 2024* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Katie Boulter | 6-3 6-1 | Lesia Tsurenko | Match data |
| Mar 7, 2023 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Lesia Tsurenko | 6-3 6-7(4) 6-4 | Katie Boulter | Match data |
| Aug 8, 2018* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Lesia Tsurenko | 6-4 6-2 | Katie Boulter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katie Boulter | #67 | #23 | 1,931 | 1,861 | 93 | 90 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 |
| Lesia Tsurenko | #370 | #23 | 2,030 | 1,889 | 180 | 200 | 47.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katie Boulter | Lesia Tsurenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #284 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2018 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #97 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #155 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2019 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #319 | 1,608 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #113 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2020 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #365 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #116 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2021 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #149 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #68 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2022 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #136 | 1,738 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #92 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2023 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #56 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 | 2015 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2024 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #24 | 1,833 | 0 | 3 | 2016 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2025 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #106 | 1,753 | 0 | 3 | 2017 | 22–24 | 47.8% | #42 | 1,699 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2026 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #67 | 1,793 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #27 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #73 | 1,734 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,746 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #118 | 1,738 | 0 | 4 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #137 | 1,745 | 0 | 4 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #31 | 1,866 | 0 | 4 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 10–20 | 33.3% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 |