H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Katja Ebbinghaus vs Marita Redondo H2H: 1-1
Katja Ebbinghaus and Marita Redondo are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Katja Ebbinghaus leads 1–0 on clay, while Marita Redondo leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Katja Ebbinghaus won the 1977 Roland Garros second round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1977* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Katja Ebbinghaus | 6-1 6-1 | Marita Redondo | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1973* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Marita Redondo | 6-1 2-6 6-2 | Katja Ebbinghaus | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katja Ebbinghaus | — | — | — | 1,873 | 173 | 143 | 54.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Marita Redondo | — | — | — | 1,905 | 136 | 118 | 53.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katja Ebbinghaus | Marita Redondo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 5–1 | 83.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 11–4 | 73.3% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,648 | 0 | 3 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 24–4 | 85.7% | — | 1,807 | 0 | 7 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 29–16 | 64.4% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–5 | 28.6% | — | 1,731 | 0 | 8 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 11–13 | 45.8% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 8 |
| 20 | 1968 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 16–17 | 48.5% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1969 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,557 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1970 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 19–17 | 52.8% | — | 1,832 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 0 | 1979 | 11–19 | 36.7% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1972 | 22–11 | 66.7% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 2 | 1980 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 8 |
| 25 | 1973 | 14–13 | 51.9% | — | 1,773 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 8 |
| 26 | 1974 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,750 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1975 | 19–14 | 57.6% | — | 1,827 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1976 | 10–9 | 52.6% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1977 | 26–14 | 65.0% | — | 1,814 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1978 | 6–16 | 27.3% | — | 1,686 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1979 | 3–4 | 42.9% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1980 | 22–10 | 68.8% | — | 1,710 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 1981 | 3–5 | 37.5% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 1982 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |