H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Katrina Adams vs Mercedes Paz H2H: 2-1
Katrina Adams holds a 2–1 lead over Mercedes Paz in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Katrina Adams leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Mercedes Paz leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mercedes Paz won the 1992 Houston third round 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 57
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 60
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 16, 1992* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Mercedes Paz | 6-1 7-5 | Katrina Adams | Match data |
| Mar 14, 1992* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Katrina Adams | 6-3 6-3 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1989* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Katrina Adams | 6-3 7-6 | Mercedes Paz | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katrina Adams | #625 | #67 | 199 | 1,608 | 55 | 114 | 32.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mercedes Paz | #521 | #28 | 185 | 1,822 | 144 | 182 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katrina Adams | Mercedes Paz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1987 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #167 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1988 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #96 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #115 | 1,526 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1989 | 14–25 | 35.9% | #84 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #60 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1990 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #256 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #88 | 1,637 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1991 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #44 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1992 | 6–15 | 28.6% | #143 | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #91 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1993 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #184 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #32 | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1994 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #144 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #71 | 1,684 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1995 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #116 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #107 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1996 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #115 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #213 | 1,495 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #278 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #140 | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #625 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #164 | 1,452 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #124 | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |