H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kazuko Sawamatsu vs Jackie Fayter H2H: 3-1
Kazuko Sawamatsu holds a 3–1 lead over Jackie Fayter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kazuko Sawamatsu leads 2–0 on clay, while Jackie Fayter leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kazuko Sawamatsu won the 1974 Toronto fourth round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1974 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Kazuko Sawamatsu | 6-2 6-0 | Jackie Fayter | Match data |
| Dec 21, 1973* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Kazuko Sawamatsu | 6-3 6-0 | Jackie Fayter | Match data |
| Sep 15, 1973* | Charlotte | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Kazuko Sawamatsu | 6-2 6-1 | Jackie Fayter | Match data |
| Mar 18, 1973* | Boston | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Jackie Fayter | 7-6 6-2 | Kazuko Sawamatsu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kazuko Sawamatsu | — | — | — | 1,952 | 181 | 99 | 64.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| Jackie Fayter | — | — | — | 1,723 | 121 | 143 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kazuko Sawamatsu | Jackie Fayter | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1969 | 16–8 | 66.7% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 3 | 1969 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1970 | 12–9 | 57.1% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 4 | 1970 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1971 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 5 | 1971 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1972 | 28–15 | 65.1% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 8 | 1972 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1973 | 38–21 | 64.4% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | 1973 | 17–29 | 37.0% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1974 | 37–20 | 64.9% | — | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1974 | 24–17 | 58.5% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1975 | 23–10 | 69.7% | — | 1,952 | 0 | 11 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 4 |