H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kazuko Sawamatsu vs Laurie Tenney H2H: 2-0
Kazuko Sawamatsu holds a 2–0 lead over Laurie Tenney in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kazuko Sawamatsu leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kazuko Sawamatsu won the 1975 Wimbledon first round 6-3 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 1975* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Kazuko Sawamatsu | 6-3 6-3 | Laurie Tenney | Match data |
| May 29, 1975* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Kazuko Sawamatsu | 6-1 6-2 | Laurie Tenney | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kazuko Sawamatsu | — | — | — | 1,952 | 181 | 99 | 64.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| Laurie Tenney | — | — | — | 1,720 | 64 | 80 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kazuko Sawamatsu | Laurie Tenney | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 12 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1968 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 6–5 | 54.5% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1968 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 17–11 | 60.7% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 1969 | 16–8 | 66.7% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,635 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 1970 | 12–9 | 57.1% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 4 | 1975 | 8–15 | 34.8% | — | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1971 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 5 | 1976 | 1–10 | 9.1% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1972 | 28–15 | 65.1% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1973 | 38–21 | 64.4% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1974 | 37–20 | 64.9% | — | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1975 | 23–10 | 69.7% | — | 1,952 | 0 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |