H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kazuko Sawamatsu vs Renata Tomanova H2H: 1-2
Renata Tomanova holds a 2–1 lead over Kazuko Sawamatsu in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Renata Tomanova leads 2–1 on clay. Most recently, Renata Tomanova won the 1975 Hamburg final 6-4 6-7(5) 10-8.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 75
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
Age 71
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 1975* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Renata Tomanova | 6-4 6-7(5) 10-8 | Kazuko Sawamatsu | Match data |
| May 24, 1974* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Kazuko Sawamatsu | 6-0 6-2 | Renata Tomanova | Match data |
| May 27, 1973* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Renata Tomanova | 3-6 6-1 7-5 | Kazuko Sawamatsu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kazuko Sawamatsu | — | — | — | 1,952 | 181 | 99 | 64.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
| Renata Tomanova | — | — | — | 1,940 | 225 | 214 | 51.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kazuko Sawamatsu | Renata Tomanova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 4–4 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1968 | 9–6 | 60.0% | — | 1,551 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1969 | 16–8 | 66.7% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 20–15 | 57.1% | — | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1970 | 12–9 | 57.1% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 4 | 1974 | 21–14 | 60.0% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1971 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,799 | 0 | 5 | 1975 | 23–16 | 59.0% | — | 1,804 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 1972 | 28–15 | 65.1% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 8 | 1976 | 28–22 | 56.0% | — | 1,840 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1973 | 38–21 | 64.4% | — | 1,823 | 0 | 8 | 1977 | 28–26 | 51.9% | — | 1,854 | 0 | 9 |
| 23 | 1974 | 37–20 | 64.9% | — | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 1978 | 28–25 | 52.8% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 9 |
| 24 | 1975 | 23–10 | 69.7% | — | 1,952 | 0 | 11 | 1979 | 21–26 | 44.7% | — | 1,692 | 0 | 9 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 22–22 | 50.0% | — | 1,679 | 0 | 9 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 18–16 | 52.9% | — | 1,682 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 9–12 | 42.9% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,570 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 9 |