H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kerry Harris vs Gail Sherriff H2H: 2-4
Gail Sherriff holds a 4–2 lead over Kerry Harris in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on grass, while Gail Sherriff leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Kerry Harris won the 1972 Australian Open quarterfinal 6-3 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 27, 1971 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | QF | Grass | Kerry Harris | 6-3 7-6 | Gail Sherriff | Match data |
| Jul 5, 1971* | Venice | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Gail Sherriff | 6-2 6-3 | Kerry Harris | Match data |
| Jan 11, 1971* | Hobart | WTA 250 | F | Grass | Gail Sherriff | 6-1 2-6 6-2 | Kerry Harris | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1969* | Haverford | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Kerry Harris | 7-5 3-6 8-6 | Gail Sherriff | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1969* | Queen's Club | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Gail Sherriff | 6-1 6-4 | Kerry Harris | Match data |
| Aug 4, 1968* | Munich | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Gail Sherriff | 6-2 6-3 | Kerry Harris | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerry Harris | — | — | — | 1,855 | 142 | 152 | 48.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Gail Sherriff | — | — | — | 1,978 | 342 | 145 | 70.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 41 | 41 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kerry Harris | Gail Sherriff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1968 | 12–20 | 37.5% | — | 1,461 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1969 | 37–27 | 57.8% | — | 1,669 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1970 | 11–21 | 34.4% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1971 | 32–24 | 57.1% | — | 1,736 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1972 | 21–23 | 47.7% | — | 1,696 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1973 | 24–23 | 51.1% | — | 1,838 | 0 | 1 | 1968 | 65–14 | 82.3% | — | 1,847 | 0 | 13 |
| 24 | 1974 | 5–13 | 27.8% | — | 1,759 | 0 | 1 | 1969 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 1,800 | 0 | 17 |
| 25 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 1 | 1970 | 52–19 | 73.2% | — | 1,933 | 0 | 21 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 49–20 | 71.0% | — | 1,921 | 0 | 23 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 35–13 | 72.9% | — | 1,860 | 0 | 28 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,758 | 0 | 28 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 30–10 | 75.0% | — | 1,877 | 0 | 34 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 17–10 | 63.0% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 38 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 18–10 | 64.3% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 38 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 38 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 15–6 | 71.4% | — | 1,772 | 0 | 39 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,721 | 0 | 39 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 9–5 | 64.3% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 40 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 1,711 | 0 | 41 |
| 37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 41 |