H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kerry Reid vs Susan Leo H2H: 0-1
Susan Leo holds a 1–0 lead over Kerry Reid in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Susan Leo leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Susan Leo won the 1979 Melbourne third round 6-3 2-6 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 1979* | Melbourne | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Susan Leo | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Kerry Reid | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kerry Reid | — | — | — | 2,215 | 586 | 245 | 70.5% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 18 | 22 |
| Susan Leo | — | — | — | 1,678 | 59 | 96 | 38.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kerry Reid | Susan Leo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 9–4 | 69.2% | — | 1,589 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 17–12 | 58.6% | — | 1,639 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 9–21 | 30.0% | — | 1,584 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1968 | 25–10 | 71.4% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 2 | 1982 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1969 | 66–22 | 75.0% | — | 1,893 | 0 | 8 | 1983 | 8–19 | 29.6% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1970 | 77–26 | 74.8% | — | 2,003 | 0 | 11 | 1984 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,564 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1971 | 55–27 | 67.1% | — | 2,154 | 0 | 14 | 1985 | 0–6 | 0.0% | — | 1,504 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1972 | 59–25 | 70.2% | — | 2,031 | 0 | 16 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1973 | 63–23 | 73.3% | — | 2,093 | 0 | 17 | 1987 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1974 | 52–14 | 78.8% | — | 2,208 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1975 | 11–10 | 52.4% | — | 2,054 | 0 | 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1976 | 28–12 | 70.0% | — | 2,072 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1977 | 45–22 | 67.2% | — | 2,076 | 1 | 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1978 | 53–25 | 67.9% | — | 2,076 | 1 | 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 1979 | 50–23 | 68.5% | — | 2,022 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 1980 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,984 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 35 | 1983 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,982 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 36 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,954 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 1985 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,945 | 1 | 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |