H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Kiki Bertens vs Dominika Cibulkova H2H: 1-1

Kiki Bertens and Dominika Cibulkova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kiki Bertens leads 1–0 on carpet, while Dominika Cibulkova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominika Cibulkova won the 2016 Hobart International quarterfinal 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kiki Bertens
NED Age 34 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Dominika Cibulkova
SVK Age 37 Right-Handed 161 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominika Cibulkova #37 7-5 6-3 Kiki Bertens #103 Match data Jan 15, 2016* QF Hobart International International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard
Kiki Bertens #65 7-5 6-4 Dominika Cibulkova #14 Match data Feb 1, 2013* R16 Paris Premier → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kiki Bertens #25 #4 5,430 2,004 216 172 55.7% 0 2 0 3 6 11
Dominika Cibulkova #315 #4 5,245 1,964 368 265 58.1% 0 0 1 4 3 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kiki Bertens Dominika Cibulkova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #153 1,506 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2007 17–17 50.0% #51 1,605 0 0
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #182 1,493 0 0 2008 36–26 58.1% #19 1,843 0 0
20 2012 11–12 47.8% #63 1,580 0 1 2009 20–17 54.1% #28 1,735 0 0
21 2013 14–19 42.4% #87 1,551 0 1 2010 30–24 55.6% #31 1,753 0 0
22 2014 11–14 44.0% #68 1,579 0 1 2011 41–21 66.1% #18 1,894 0 1
23 2015 7–17 29.2% #104 1,520 0 1 2012 34–26 56.7% #15 1,790 0 2
24 2016 26–20 56.5% #22 1,689 0 2 2013 27–23 54.0% #23 1,734 0 3
25 2017 30–26 53.6% #31 1,696 0 5 2014 33–22 60.0% #10 1,719 0 4
26 2018 46–23 66.7% #9 1,911 0 8 2015 19–16 54.3% #38 1,756 0 4
27 2019 57–26 68.7% #9 1,897 0 10 2016 53–21 71.6% #5 1,951 0 8
28 2020 13–6 68.4% #9 1,882 0 11 2017 26–22 54.2% #26 1,778 0 8
29 2021 1–8 11.1% #25 1,733 0 11 2018 28–19 59.6% #25 1,872 0 8
30 — — — — — — — 2019 2–9 18.2% #315 1,755 0 8

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kiki Bertens Dominika Cibulkova
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 10 12 22 45.5% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — —
19 2011 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2008 27 18 45 60.0% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 2012 5 7 12 41.7% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2009 7 10 17 41.2% 11 5 16 68.8% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
21 2013 5 8 13 38.5% 6 8 14 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 2010 18 18 36 50.0% 8 4 12 66.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
22 2014 5 10 15 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — 2011 29 15 44 65.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 2015 3 12 15 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2012 19 17 36 52.8% 13 6 19 68.4% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
24 2016 7 14 21 33.3% 17 5 22 77.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2013 19 15 34 55.9% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2017 7 16 23 30.4% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2014 29 17 46 63.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
26 2018 26 15 41 63.4% 15 5 20 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2015 17 14 31 54.8% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
27 2019 30 18 48 62.5% 18 5 23 78.3% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — 2016 37 17 54 68.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 9 1 10 90.0% — — — —
28 2020 10 3 13 76.9% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2017 22 15 37 59.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
29 2021 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2018 18 11 29 62.1% 5 5 10 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1 5 6 16.7% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 98 107 205 47.8% 95 45 140 67.9% 20 19 39 51.3% 3 1 4 75.0% — 254 185 439 57.9% 72 53 125 57.6% 39 24 63 61.9% 3 3 6 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 361/388 of Kiki Bertens's and 558/630 of Dominika Cibulkova's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Kiki Bertens Dominika Cibulkova
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 23/34 0.3 3.9 62.2% 56.6% 46.2% 51.0% 47.4% 52.3% 45.7%
19 2011 1/1 3.0 5.0 53.7% 61.1% 32.3% 50.0% 42.9% 47.8% 40.9% 2008 56/62 0.8 2.7 68.4% 60.8% 48.3% 54.4% 46.5% 56.7% 46.6%
20 2012 23/23 2.9 4.1 60.5% 65.3% 41.1% 49.3% 48.2% 55.7% 42.3% 2009 36/37 0.6 3.3 67.4% 60.0% 49.3% 52.6% 53.6% 56.4% 46.9%
21 2013 30/33 2.2 5.5 57.6% 61.8% 42.9% 51.9% 45.5% 54.1% 43.7% 2010 50/54 1.1 3.7 63.2% 60.8% 46.2% 53.9% 50.9% 55.6% 43.9%
22 2014 22/25 2.7 4.0 58.1% 60.8% 44.5% 49.6% 41.8% 53.8% 45.8% 2011 53/62 1.1 4.2 56.1% 64.9% 46.5% 54.6% 53.9% 56.8% 48.0%
23 2015 19/24 1.9 5.1 63.9% 59.1% 51.6% 53.8% 57.3% 56.1% 36.8% 2012 52/60 1.5 4.2 54.2% 66.3% 45.8% 50.4% 53.3% 56.4% 48.0%
24 2016 45/46 3.8 3.4 60.1% 67.4% 47.6% 55.6% 44.9% 59.0% 46.0% 2013 45/50 0.9 4.8 60.8% 61.9% 44.4% 53.5% 44.6% 55.1% 45.9%
25 2017 54/56 4.5 4.4 55.5% 71.4% 43.7% 54.1% 50.0% 59.1% 45.9% 2014 51/55 0.8 4.3 66.5% 62.6% 45.5% 57.1% 50.5% 57.0% 47.7%
26 2018 64/69 4.8 4.0 58.0% 69.1% 47.9% 51.8% 51.7% 60.0% 46.8% 2015 24/35 1.0 4.1 67.0% 61.0% 48.2% 53.0% 43.9% 56.6% 43.0%
27 2019 76/83 5.6 4.4 57.1% 72.6% 47.2% 58.5% 48.8% 61.8% 43.6% 2016 67/74 1.0 3.2 66.4% 62.7% 47.5% 54.7% 50.3% 57.8% 48.0%
28 2020 19/19 4.2 3.8 63.7% 68.3% 43.5% 59.6% 57.0% 59.1% 47.0% 2017 46/48 0.8 2.9 66.1% 62.2% 48.0% 55.2% 49.2% 57.4% 45.5%
29 2021 8/9 1.5 4.8 64.5% 58.8% 40.4% 44.2% 43.1% 51.9% 37.9% 2018 45/48 1.1 3.9 65.2% 63.3% 48.4% 55.6% 48.6% 58.1% 44.3%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2019 10/11 0.9 4.5 66.1% 58.8% 45.1% 54.3% 40.4% 54.2% 38.4%
Career — 361/388 4.0 4.3 58.6% 67.8% 45.8% 54.1% 49.0% 58.5% 44.6% — 558/634 0.9 3.7 63.5% 62.2% 46.9% 54.0% 49.6% 56.5% 46.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kiki Bertens Dominika Cibulkova
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1506 100.7 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.20 2–0 1–1 — +0.22
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1606 123.4 -2.75 +1.36 0.957 49.0% -43 +45 — 48.7% +0.04 6–4 (60%) 4–6 (40%) 103.8 +0.03
19 2011 1494 97.6 +1.77 -1.03 0.783 44.4% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — -0.13 2008 1844 155.6 +2.09 +2.87 1.075 51.6% -8 -147 — 59.4% +0.56 10–9 (53%) 8–3 (73%) 108.8 -3.69
20 2012 1580 118.0 +0.05 -1.16 0.955 49.1% -24 +11 +4 47.1% -0.27 5–2 (71%) 3–1 (75%) 107.6 -0.87 2009 1735 137.2 +0.81 +1.93 1.075 51.5% -29 +84 -128 59.0% +0.64 4–6 (40%) 4–4 (50%) 97.6 +0.20
21 2013 1551 121.8 -1.34 -0.74 0.952 48.8% +33 +22 — 44.6% -0.39 5–7 (42%) 3–3 (50%) 98.8 -1.04 2010 1754 142.7 +0.27 +0.68 0.989 49.8% -26 +62 -79 54.4% +0.28 9–8 (53%) 8–2 (80%) 105.0 +0.39
22 2014 1580 124.4 -1.78 +0.96 0.993 49.7% -23 +77 — 47.2% -0.02 4–5 (44%) 3–3 (50%) 100.6 -0.24 2011 1894 146.9 +1.53 +4.23 1.113 52.5% -32 -107 -88 61.0% +0.76 15–7 (68%) 9–5 (64%) 108.0 -1.26
23 2015 1520 114.8 -1.77 -2.92 0.837 46.5% -52 +93 +82 34.5% -1.07 2–7 (22%) 3–2 (60%) 95.7 -1.23 2012 1791 146.5 +0.57 +4.09 1.101 52.3% -2 +69 -30 59.1% +0.78 6–11 (35%) 10–4 (71%) 97.7 +0.95
24 2016 1689 132.6 +2.91 +1.95 1.122 52.4% -129 +137 -72 54.6% +0.61 6–5 (55%) 6–5 (55%) 101.8 -1.68 2013 1735 139.1 +0.40 +2.51 1.022 50.5% +15 +39 +28 51.7% +0.30 11–7 (61%) 6–7 (46%) 98.9 +0.89
25 2017 1696 135.9 +2.41 +1.24 1.122 52.6% -173 +308 -130 54.9% +0.68 3–8 (27%) 3–8 (27%) 90.8 +1.57 2014 1719 152.6 +1.29 +4.23 1.109 52.3% +50 +17 +28 59.8% +0.75 9–9 (50%) 6–7 (46%) 96.4 -0.25
26 2018 1911 154.4 +3.14 +4.20 1.171 53.3% -97 +80 -217 63.3% +1.14 14–12 (54%) 10–15 (40%) 100.3 -1.83 2015 1757 143.5 -0.51 +1.77 0.989 49.9% +26 — -24 50.6% +0.07 8–5 (62%) 6–4 (60%) 105.0 -0.11
27 2019 1897 153.7 +4.80 +1.58 1.142 52.4% -14 +155 -90 65.1% +0.95 18–13 (58%) 12–12 (50%) 102.5 +0.54 2016 1952 148.1 +2.12 +4.65 1.136 52.9% -29 -154 -64 65.1% +0.91 19–10 (66%) 9–6 (60%) 108.8 -1.07
28 2020 1883 144.7 +1.90 +2.64 1.150 53.1% +54 +91 — 65.1% +1.09 5–2 (71%) 3–0 (100%) 105.1 +1.01 2017 1778 142.2 +1.03 +1.88 1.067 51.5% +59 -13 +40 55.3% +0.37 9–11 (45%) 5–5 (50%) 93.4 +2.63
29 2021 1733 102.2 -2.11 -1.63 0.787 44.9% +114 +208 — 20.0% -2.00 0–2 — — +0.66 2018 1872 145.7 +1.54 +1.61 1.058 51.3% +3 -108 -24 58.3% +0.53 7–7 (50%) 7–5 (58%) 101.4 -0.82
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2019 1755 115.9 -0.72 -0.79 0.839 46.7% +34 -72 — 29.6% -1.19 1–4 (20%) 0–1 — -0.69
Career — 2004 143.8 +2.04 +1.38 1.074 51.4% -53 +144 -88 55.1% +0.46 62–63 (50%) 46–50 (48%) 100.2 -0.84 — 1964 150.3 +0.95 +2.81 1.063 51.4% 0 -11 -38 57.0% +0.50 116–98 (54%) 83–60 (58%) 107.2 -0.41

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.