H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 04:30 UTC

Kiki Bertens vs Petra Kvitova H2H: 3-3

Kiki Bertens and Petra Kvitova are tied 3–3 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Petra Kvitova leads 2–1 on clay, while Kiki Bertens leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kiki Bertens won the 2019 Madrid quarterfinal 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kiki Bertens
NED Age 34 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Petra Kvitova
CZE Age 36 Left-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
May 10, 2019* Madrid WTA 1000 QF Clay Kiki Bertens #7 6-2 6-3 Petra Kvitova #2 Match data
Apr 27, 2019* Stuttgart WTA 500 SF Clay Petra Kvitova #3 7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 Kiki Bertens #7 Match data
Aug 18, 2018* Cincinnati WTA 1000 SF Hard Kiki Bertens #17 3-6 6-4 6-2 Petra Kvitova #6 Match data
Aug 10, 2018* Montreal WTA 1000 R16 Hard Kiki Bertens #18 6-3 6-2 Petra Kvitova #8 Match data
May 12, 2018* Madrid WTA 1000 F Clay Petra Kvitova #10 7-6(6) 4-6 6-3 Kiki Bertens #20 Match data
Jul 1, 2015* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Petra Kvitova #2 6-1 6-0 Kiki Bertens #108 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kiki Bertens #25 #4 5,430 2,015 214 168 56.0% 0 2 0 3 6 11
Petra Kvitova #450 #2 7,690 2,073 501 258 66.0% 2 10 2 14 3 31

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kiki Bertens Petra Kvitova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2007 0–1 0.0% #150 1,485 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 2008 13–14 48.1% #50 1,607 0 0
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #182 1,493 0 0 2009 18–16 52.9% #61 1,700 0 1
20 2012 11–12 47.8% #63 1,581 0 1 2010 17–20 45.9% #34 1,699 0 1
21 2013 14–19 42.4% #87 1,552 0 1 2011 50–11 82.0% #2 2,058 1 7
22 2014 11–14 44.0% #68 1,580 0 1 2012 38–15 71.7% #8 1,961 1 9
23 2015 7–17 29.2% #104 1,520 0 1 2013 49–22 69.0% #6 1,966 1 11
24 2016 27–19 58.7% #22 1,723 0 2 2014 41–17 70.7% #4 1,989 2 14
25 2017 30–26 53.6% #31 1,684 0 5 2015 35–16 68.6% #6 1,907 2 17
26 2018 46–22 67.6% #9 1,912 0 8 2016 41–19 68.3% #11 1,966 2 19
27 2019 54–25 68.4% #9 1,897 0 10 2017 18–10 64.3% #29 1,894 2 20
28 2020 13–6 68.4% #9 1,883 0 11 2018 42–17 71.2% #7 1,887 2 25
29 2021 1–7 12.5% #25 1,749 0 11 2019 33–16 67.3% #7 1,897 2 27
30 — — — — — — — 2020 20–7 74.1% #8 1,947 2 27
31 — — — — — — — 2021 28–17 62.2% #17 1,881 2 28
32 — — — — — — — 2022 28–19 59.6% #16 1,920 2 29
33 — — — — — — — 2023 29–13 69.0% #14 1,931 2 31
35 — — — — — — — 2025 1–8 11.1% — 1,773 2 31