H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kiki Bertens vs Serena Williams H2H: 0-3

Serena Williams holds a 3–0 lead over Kiki Bertens in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Serena Williams leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Serena Williams won the 2018 Indian Wells second round 7-6(5) 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kiki Bertens
NED Age 34 Right-Handed 182 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0 – 3
3 main draw meetings
Serena Williams
USA Age 44 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Mar 10, 2018* Indian Wells WTA 1000 R64 Hard Serena Williams #22 7-6(5) 7-5 Kiki Bertens #29 Match data
Jun 4, 2016* Roland Garros Grand Slam SF Clay Serena Williams #1 7-6(7) 6-4 Kiki Bertens #58 Match data
Sep 3, 2015* US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Serena Williams #1 7-6(5) 6-3 Kiki Bertens #110 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kiki Bertens #25 #4 5,430 2,015 214 168 56.0% 0 2 0 3 6 11
Serena Williams #320 #1 13,615 2,405 825 170 82.9% 23 23 5 17 3 71

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kiki Bertens Serena Williams
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1997 3–2 60.0% #101 1,582 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1998 26–11 70.3% #20 1,895 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1999 37–7 84.1% #4 2,170 1 4
18 — — — — — — — 2000 37–8 82.2% #6 2,174 1 7
19 2011 0–1 0.0% #182 1,493 0 0 2001 40–7 85.1% #6 2,259 1 10
20 2012 11–12 47.8% #63 1,581 0 1 2002 57–5 91.9% #1 2,348 4 18
21 2013 14–19 42.4% #87 1,552 0 1 2003 36–3 92.3% #3 2,369 6 22
22 2014 11–14 44.0% #68 1,580 0 1 2004 39–11 78.0% #7 2,192 6 24
23 2015 7–17 29.2% #104 1,520 0 1 2005 21–9 70.0% #11 2,028 7 25
24 2016 27–19 58.7% #22 1,723 0 2 2006 12–4 75.0% #95 2,016 7 25
25 2017 30–26 53.6% #31 1,684 0 5 2007 34–10 77.3% #7 2,058 8 27
26 2018 46–22 67.6% #9 1,912 0 8 2008 41–8 83.7% #2 2,109 9 31
27 2019 54–25 68.4% #9 1,897 0 10 2009 50–13 79.4% #1 2,106 11 34
28 2020 13–6 68.4% #9 1,883 0 11 2010 25–4 86.2% #4 2,149 13 36
29 2021 1–7 12.5% #25 1,749 0 11 2011 22–4 84.6% #12 2,155 13 38
30 — — — — — — — 2012 48–6 88.9% #3 2,239 15 44
31 — — — — — — — 2013 77–5 93.9% #1 2,345 17 55
32 — — — — — — — 2014 52–10 83.9% #1 2,209 18 62
33 — — — — — — — 2015 50–6 89.3% #1 2,197 21 67
34 — — — — — — — 2016 36–5 87.8% #2 2,177 22 69
35 — — — — — — — 2017 8–1 88.9% #22 2,172 23 70
36 — — — — — — — 2018 18–7 72.0% #16 2,078 23 70
37 — — — — — — — 2019 25–8 75.8% #10 2,052 23 70
38 — — — — — — — 2020 16–5 76.2% #11 1,991 23 71
39 — — — — — — — 2021 12–6 66.7% #41 1,950 23 71
40 — — — — — — — 2022 3–4 42.9% #320 1,891 23 71
44 — — — — — — — 2026 0–1 0.0% #320 — 23 71