H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kim Clijsters vs Amanda Coetzer H2H: 4-0
Kim Clijsters holds a 4–0 lead over Amanda Coetzer in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2003 Australian Open fourth round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
0
4 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 54
Right-Handed
158 cm / 5'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 22, 2003* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R16 | Hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-3 6-1 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| Oct 18, 2002* | Zurich | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-1 6-1 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| Oct 27, 2001* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-3 6-4 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1999* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Kim Clijsters | 6-2 6-4 | Amanda Coetzer | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Clijsters | #1,140 | #1 | 8,895 | 2,275 | 463 | 127 | 78.5% | 4 | 7 | 3 | 21 | 6 | 41 |
| Amanda Coetzer | #289 | #3 | 3,380 | 2,051 | 491 | 307 | 61.5% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Clijsters | Amanda Coetzer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #46 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #152 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #18 | 1,911 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 16–13 | 55.2% | #63 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #5 | 2,030 | 0 | 6 | 1990 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #76 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,143 | 0 | 10 | 1991 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #68 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 86–12 | 87.8% | #2 | 2,260 | 0 | 19 | 1992 | 35–15 | 70.0% | #17 | 1,857 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 18–4 | 81.8% | #22 | 2,188 | 0 | 21 | 1993 | 42–18 | 70.0% | #15 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2005 | 66–9 | 88.0% | #2 | 2,215 | 1 | 30 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #18 | 1,885 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2006 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,147 | 1 | 33 | 1995 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #19 | 1,910 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2007 | 14–4 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,113 | 1 | 34 | 1996 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #14 | 1,863 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 60–25 | 70.6% | #4 | 2,013 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–3 | 81.2% | #18 | 2,128 | 2 | 35 | 1998 | 32–23 | 58.2% | #17 | 1,887 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2010 | 39–7 | 84.8% | #3 | 2,182 | 3 | 40 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #11 | 1,815 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2011 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #13 | 2,049 | 4 | 41 | 2000 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #12 | 1,892 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | 2012 | 17–6 | 73.9% | #20 | 1,989 | 4 | 41 | 2001 | 32–21 | 60.4% | #19 | 1,786 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #21 | 1,795 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #25 | 1,738 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #286 | 1,718 | 0 | 9 |
| 37 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1030 | 1,927 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1154 | 1,881 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |