H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kim Clijsters vs Amy Frazier H2H: 2-0
Kim Clijsters holds a 2–0 lead over Amy Frazier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2005 Miami second round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 53
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2005* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-2 6-3 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
| May 28, 2003* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Kim Clijsters | 6-2 6-0 | Amy Frazier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Clijsters | #1,140 | #1 | 8,895 | 2,275 | 463 | 127 | 78.5% | 4 | 7 | 3 | 21 | 6 | 41 |
| Amy Frazier | #450 | #13 | 1,381 | 1,959 | 416 | 307 | 57.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Clijsters | Amy Frazier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #147 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 12–15 | 44.4% | #58 | 1,638 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1999 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #46 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #33 | 1,725 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #18 | 1,911 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 31–14 | 68.9% | #16 | 1,893 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | 2001 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #5 | 2,030 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #28 | 1,813 | 0 | 2 |
| 19 | 2002 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,143 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 33–17 | 66.0% | #19 | 1,842 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2003 | 86–12 | 87.8% | #2 | 2,260 | 0 | 19 | 1993 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #39 | 1,843 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2004 | 18–4 | 81.8% | #22 | 2,188 | 0 | 21 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #16 | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2005 | 66–9 | 88.0% | #2 | 2,215 | 1 | 30 | 1995 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,877 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2006 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,147 | 1 | 33 | 1996 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #33 | 1,835 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2007 | 14–4 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,113 | 1 | 34 | 1997 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #37 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #42 | 1,766 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–3 | 81.2% | #18 | 2,128 | 2 | 35 | 1999 | 31–19 | 62.0% | #19 | 1,876 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2010 | 39–7 | 84.8% | #3 | 2,182 | 3 | 40 | 2000 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,852 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2011 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #13 | 2,049 | 4 | 41 | 2001 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #48 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | 2012 | 17–6 | 73.9% | #20 | 1,989 | 4 | 41 | 2002 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #39 | 1,757 | 0 | 6 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #61 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #26 | 1,828 | 0 | 7 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #52 | 1,730 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #130 | 1,626 | 0 | 8 |
| 37 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1030 | 1,927 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1154 | 1,881 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |