H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kim Clijsters vs Barbara Rittner H2H: 3-0
Kim Clijsters holds a 3–0 lead over Barbara Rittner in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2003 S Hertogenbosch semifinal 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 16, 2003 | S Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Kim Clijsters | 6-2 6-1 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
| Sep 28, 2002* | Leipzig | WTA 500 | QF | Carpet | Kim Clijsters | 6-1 6-0 | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
| May 4, 2002* | Hamburg | WTA 500 | R16 | Clay | Kim Clijsters | 6-3 2-1 (ret.) | Barbara Rittner | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Clijsters | #1,140 | #1 | 8,895 | 2,275 | 463 | 127 | 78.5% | 4 | 7 | 3 | 21 | 6 | 41 |
| Barbara Rittner | #438 | #24 | 661 | 1,883 | 209 | 217 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Clijsters | Barbara Rittner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #46 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #18 | 1,911 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #110 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #5 | 2,030 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #43 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,143 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #29 | 1,829 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2003 | 86–12 | 87.8% | #2 | 2,260 | 0 | 19 | 1993 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #34 | 1,838 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2004 | 18–4 | 81.8% | #22 | 2,188 | 0 | 21 | 1994 | 25–18 | 58.1% | #40 | 1,818 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2005 | 66–9 | 88.0% | #2 | 2,215 | 1 | 30 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2006 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,147 | 1 | 33 | 1996 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #47 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2007 | 14–4 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,113 | 1 | 34 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #71 | 1,653 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #66 | 1,664 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–3 | 81.2% | #18 | 2,128 | 2 | 35 | 1999 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2010 | 39–7 | 84.8% | #3 | 2,182 | 3 | 40 | 2000 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #99 | 1,661 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2011 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #13 | 2,049 | 4 | 41 | 2001 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #68 | 1,618 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2012 | 17–6 | 73.9% | #20 | 1,989 | 4 | 41 | 2002 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #66 | 1,632 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #235 | 1,571 | 0 | 2 |
| 37 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1030 | 1,927 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1154 | 1,881 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |