H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kim Clijsters vs Chanda Rubin H2H: 7-0

Kim Clijsters holds a 7–0 lead over Chanda Rubin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 7–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2003 WTA Tour Championships round-robin match 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Clijsters
BEL Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
7 – 0
7 main draw meetings
Chanda Rubin
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Nov 5, 2003 WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals RR Hard Kim Clijsters #1 6-4 6-4 Chanda Rubin #10 Match data
Oct 26, 2003* Luxembourg WTA 250 F Hard Kim Clijsters #2 6-2 7-5 Chanda Rubin #10 Match data
Mar 10, 2003* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Kim Clijsters #3 6-2 6-3 Chanda Rubin #12 Match data
Jan 11, 2003* Sydney WTA 500 QF Hard Kim Clijsters #4 6-1 6-2 Chanda Rubin #13 Match data
Nov 11, 2002* WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals R16 Hard Kim Clijsters #4 6-1 6-2 Chanda Rubin #13 Match data
Jul 28, 2001* Stanford WTA 500 QF Hard Kim Clijsters #6 6-3 6-1 Chanda Rubin #26 Match data
Jan 15, 2000* Hobart WTA 250 F Hard Kim Clijsters #43 2-6 6-2 6-2 Chanda Rubin #21 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kim Clijsters #1,140 #1 8,895 2,275 463 127 78.5% 4 7 3 21 6 41
Chanda Rubin #1,122 #6 2,554 2,047 343 231 59.8% 0 1 0 5 1 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Clijsters Chanda Rubin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #526 1,489 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1991 8–6 57.1% #84 1,583 0 0
16 1999 16–7 69.6% #46 1,724 0 1 1992 10–15 40.0% #84 1,617 0 0
17 2000 28–15 65.1% #18 1,911 0 3 1993 15–17 46.9% #70 1,653 0 0
18 2001 54–19 74.0% #5 2,030 0 6 1994 28–17 62.2% #23 1,804 0 0
19 2002 50–17 74.6% #4 2,143 0 10 1995 38–19 66.7% #15 1,945 0 0
20 2003 86–12 87.8% #2 2,260 0 19 1996 20–9 69.0% #17 1,989 0 0
21 2004 18–4 81.8% #22 2,188 0 21 1997 23–20 53.5% #32 1,814 0 1
22 2005 66–9 88.0% #2 2,215 1 30 1998 20–19 51.3% #35 1,800 0 1
23 2006 41–12 77.4% #5 2,147 1 33 1999 33–20 62.3% #22 1,843 0 2
24 2007 14–4 77.8% #5 2,113 1 34 2000 42–22 65.6% #13 1,910 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 2001 16–16 50.0% #52 1,806 0 3
26 2009 13–3 81.2% #18 2,128 2 35 2002 29–11 72.5% #13 1,958 0 5
27 2010 39–7 84.8% #3 2,182 3 40 2003 43–20 68.3% #9 1,917 0 7
28 2011 21–7 75.0% #13 2,049 4 41 2004 16–10 61.5% #52 1,860 0 7
29 2012 17–6 73.9% #20 1,989 4 41 2005 1–2 33.3% #545 1,823 0 7
30 — — — — — — — 2006 1–7 12.5% #486 1,719 0 7
37 2020 0–3 0.0% #1030 1,927 4 41 — — — — — — —
38 2021 0–2 0.0% #1154 1,881 4 41 — — — — — — —