H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kim Clijsters vs Conchita Martínez H2H: 5-1

Kim Clijsters holds a 5–1 lead over Conchita Martínez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2005 Eastbourne fourth round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Clijsters
BEL Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 – 1
6 main draw meetings
Conchita Martínez
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 17, 2005* Eastbourne WTA 500 R16 Grass Kim Clijsters #17 6-2 6-2 Conchita Martínez #47 Match data
Mar 14, 2005* Indian Wells WTA 1000 QF Hard Kim Clijsters #133 6-1 3-6 6-2 Conchita Martínez #31 Match data
Jun 5, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Kim Clijsters #2 6-2 6-1 Conchita Martínez #22 Match data
Mar 10, 2003* Indian Wells WTA 1000 SF Hard Kim Clijsters #3 6-3 6-2 Conchita Martínez #30 Match data
Oct 7, 2000* Filderstadt WTA 500 QF Hard Kim Clijsters #45 7-5 7-5 Conchita Martínez #6 Match data
Aug 3, 2000* San Diego WTA 500 R32 Hard Conchita Martínez #6 6-3 6-4 Kim Clijsters #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kim Clijsters #1,140 #1 8,895 2,275 463 127 78.5% 4 7 3 21 6 41
Conchita Martínez #1,498 #2 3,180 2,263 669 275 70.9% 1 9 0 4 19 33

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Clijsters Conchita Martínez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 16–7 69.6% #46 1,724 0 1 1988 14–6 70.0% #41 1,730 0 1
17 2000 28–15 65.1% #18 1,911 0 3 1989 35–9 79.5% #7 1,933 0 4
18 2001 54–19 74.0% #5 2,030 0 6 1990 38–10 79.2% #11 2,063 0 7
19 2002 50–17 74.6% #4 2,143 0 10 1991 36–12 75.0% #9 2,076 0 10
20 2003 86–12 87.8% #2 2,260 0 19 1992 44–16 73.3% #8 2,054 0 11
21 2004 18–4 81.8% #22 2,188 0 21 1993 66–13 83.5% #4 2,158 0 16
22 2005 66–9 88.0% #2 2,215 1 30 1994 51–14 78.5% #3 2,065 1 20
23 2006 41–12 77.4% #5 2,147 1 33 1995 57–10 85.1% #2 2,182 1 26
24 2007 14–4 77.8% #5 2,113 1 34 1996 44–16 73.3% #4 2,074 1 28
25 — — — — — — — 1997 37–19 66.1% #12 2,011 1 28
26 2009 13–3 81.2% #18 2,128 2 35 1998 38–16 70.4% #8 1,968 1 30
27 2010 39–7 84.8% #3 2,182 3 40 1999 38–22 63.3% #15 1,898 1 31
28 2011 21–7 75.0% #13 2,049 4 41 2000 48–19 71.6% #5 1,951 1 32
29 2012 17–6 73.9% #20 1,989 4 41 2001 19–13 59.4% #35 1,852 1 32
30 — — — — — — — 2002 26–24 52.0% #34 1,756 1 32
31 — — — — — — — 2003 29–21 58.0% #18 1,756 1 32
32 — — — — — — — 2004 20–16 55.6% #42 1,772 1 32
33 — — — — — — — 2005 29–19 60.4% #31 1,812 1 33
37 2020 0–3 0.0% #1030 1,927 4 41 — — — — — — —
38 2021 0–2 0.0% #1154 1,881 4 41 — — — — — — —