H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kim Clijsters vs Dominique Monami H2H: 1-1

Kim Clijsters and Dominique Monami are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 1–0 on carpet, while Dominique Monami leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominique Monami won the 2000 Australian Open first round 3-6 6-1 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Clijsters
BEL Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Dominique Monami
BEL Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominique Monami #16 3-6 6-1 6-1 Kim Clijsters #34 Match data Jan 19, 2000* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Kim Clijsters #83 6-2 6-2 Dominique Monami #13 Match data Sep 26, 1999* F Luxembourg Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Clijsters #1,140 #1 8,895 2,299 466 128 78.5% 4 7 3 18 9 41
Dominique Monami #24 #9 2,196 1,974 208 158 56.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Clijsters Dominique Monami
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 16–7 69.6% #46 1,724 0 1 — — — — — — —
17 2000 28–15 65.1% #18 1,913 0 3 — — — — — — —
18 2001 54–19 74.0% #5 2,036 0 6 1991 4–5 44.4% #129 1,528 0 0
19 2002 50–17 74.6% #4 2,146 0 10 1992 9–14 39.1% #99 1,550 0 0
20 2003 86–12 87.8% #2 2,261 0 19 1993 15–14 51.7% #59 1,672 0 0
21 2004 18–4 81.8% #22 2,246 0 21 1994 7–16 30.4% #134 1,601 0 0
22 2005 66–9 88.0% #2 2,234 1 30 1995 12–9 57.1% #43 1,680 0 0
23 2006 41–12 77.4% #5 2,165 1 33 1996 14–14 50.0% #48 1,698 0 1
24 2007 14–4 77.8% #5 2,128 1 34 1997 39–17 69.6% #18 1,875 0 3
25 — — — — — — — 1998 45–24 65.2% #12 1,918 0 4
26 2009 13–3 81.2% #18 2,140 2 35 1999 37–25 59.7% #14 1,840 0 4
27 2010 39–7 84.8% #3 2,189 3 40 2000 26–20 56.5% #24 1,842 0 4
28 2011 21–7 75.0% #13 2,054 4 41 — — — — — — —
29 2012 20–7 74.1% #20 2,022 4 41 — — — — — — —
37 2020 0–3 0.0% #1030 1,956 4 41 — — — — — — —
38 2021 0–2 0.0% #1154 1,908 4 41 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Clijsters Dominique Monami
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1999 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 32 12 44 72.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 0 4 100.0% 1991 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 3 5 40.0%
19 2002 37 11 48 77.1% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
20 2003 57 7 64 89.1% 15 2 17 88.2% 9 1 10 90.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1993 5 6 11 45.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7%
21 2004 13 3 16 81.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% 1994 5 7 12 41.7% 0 6 6 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
22 2005 50 5 55 90.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 1995 6 6 12 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
23 2006 24 8 32 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 6 2 8 75.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0%
24 2007 14 3 17 82.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1997 21 7 28 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 8 3 11 72.7%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 21 10 31 67.7% 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% 12 6 18 66.7%
26 2009 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 17 11 28 60.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 7 18 61.1%
27 2010 32 4 36 88.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — 2000 16 13 29 55.2% 6 4 10 60.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2011 16 4 20 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2020 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2021 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 322 80 402 80.1% 59 23 82 72.0% 54 17 71 76.1% 31 8 39 79.5% — 100 74 174 57.5% 36 35 71 50.7% 25 18 43 58.1% 47 31 78 60.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Clijsters Dominique Monami
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1999 1725 145.5 — — — — -30 -155 -56 67.3% +1.53 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2000 1913 156.2 — — — — +15 -370 -218 60.2% +0.62 11–8 (58%) 8–2 (80%) 107.4 -1.40 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2001 2036 161.2 — — — — +15 -316 -171 69.3% +1.43 15–7 (68%) 7–2 (78%) 111.5 -0.33 1991 1529 107.3 — — — — +48 — — 50.0% -0.19 — — — +0.79
19 2002 2146 168.0 — — — — +28 -315 -318 69.1% +1.50 12–9 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 100.6 -1.80 1992 1551 121.2 — — — — +78 -68 — 39.6% -0.74 4–3 (57%) 1–1 — +1.30
20 2003 2262 176.5 +7.01 +7.29 1.478 58.4% +19 -206 -246 83.9% +2.65 12–7 (63%) 5–1 (83%) 104.0 -2.52 1993 1673 124.4 — — — — +19 -121 — 51.6% -0.16 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) 102.4 +0.78
21 2004 2247 155.4 +3.47 +3.81 1.426 57.9% +5 — — 90.2% +2.95 2–1 (67%) 4–0 (100%) 102.2 -0.05 1994 1601 118.4 — — — — +38 -104 -2 34.0% -1.21 3–4 (43%) 3–1 (75%) 101.2 -0.21
22 2005 2235 173.2 +5.59 +5.46 1.367 56.6% +51 -182 -131 85.4% +2.89 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 97.3 -0.64 1995 1681 130.2 — — — — +6 — — 59.5% +0.60 1–3 (25%) 0–2 — +0.06
23 2006 2166 165.9 +5.11 +5.07 1.249 54.5% +47 -71 -23 75.2% +1.82 9–4 (69%) 6–2 (75%) 101.0 -2.33 1996 1699 137.0 — — — — -80 -64 -8 52.5% +0.41 1–4 (20%) 2–4 (33%) 97.4 +0.12
24 2007 2128 161.0 +4.97 +3.93 1.322 55.5% +66 — — 70.7% +1.95 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 +0.04 1997 1876 147.0 — — — — -17 -173 -163 66.9% +1.26 8–7 (53%) 7–4 (64%) 104.5 +2.75
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1918 156.3 — — — — +11 -179 -122 62.9% +0.87 10–7 (59%) 8–4 (67%) 104.2 +1.39
26 2009 2141 159.8 +6.04 +5.04 1.334 55.9% +56 — — 73.7% +1.87 4–2 (67%) 0–1 — -1.42 1999 1840 149.4 — — — — +15 -122 -45 58.8% +0.77 8–5 (62%) 4–6 (40%) 100.4 +2.82
27 2010 2190 168.6 +6.21 +7.25 1.348 56.4% +54 — -96 76.2% +2.15 11–4 (73%) 6–4 (60%) 103.3 -2.07 2000 1842 150.9 — — — — +7 -105 +50 58.8% +0.69 8–5 (62%) 5–6 (45%) 102.9 -2.21
28 2011 2055 151.4 +3.98 +4.33 1.252 54.8% +97 — — 72.9% +1.73 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 101.4 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 2023 145.0 +6.00 +3.05 1.314 55.0% +75 — +54 73.6% +1.85 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2020 1956 116.1 +0.27 +0.94 0.751 45.5% +63 — — 14.3% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2021 1908 106.1 +0.32 -1.68 0.864 46.7% — — — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2299 172.4 +5.39 +5.26 1.313 55.7% +36 -226 -114 74.6% +1.92 99–56 (64%) 55–34 (62%) 106.7 -2.42 — 1974 148.4 — — — — +10 -125 -56 56.7% +0.49 46–41 (53%) 34–30 (53%) 105.7 +2.09

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.