H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Kim Clijsters vs Dominique Monami H2H: 1-1
Kim Clijsters and Dominique Monami are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 1–0 on carpet, while Dominique Monami leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Dominique Monami won the 2000 Australian Open first round 3-6 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 53
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 2000* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Dominique Monami | 3-6 6-1 6-1 | Kim Clijsters | Match data |
| Sep 26, 1999* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | F | Carpet | Kim Clijsters | 6-2 6-2 | Dominique Monami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Clijsters | #1,140 | #1 | 8,895 | 2,275 | 463 | 127 | 78.5% | 4 | 7 | 3 | 21 | 6 | 41 |
| Dominique Monami | #24 | #9 | 2,196 | 1,973 | 205 | 156 | 56.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Clijsters | Dominique Monami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #46 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #18 | 1,911 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #5 | 2,030 | 0 | 6 | 1991 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #129 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,143 | 0 | 10 | 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #99 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 86–12 | 87.8% | #2 | 2,260 | 0 | 19 | 1993 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #59 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 18–4 | 81.8% | #22 | 2,188 | 0 | 21 | 1994 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #134 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 66–9 | 88.0% | #2 | 2,215 | 1 | 30 | 1995 | 12–9 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,147 | 1 | 33 | 1996 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2007 | 14–4 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,113 | 1 | 34 | 1997 | 39–17 | 69.6% | #18 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #12 | 1,917 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–3 | 81.2% | #18 | 2,128 | 2 | 35 | 1999 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #14 | 1,839 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 2010 | 39–7 | 84.8% | #3 | 2,182 | 3 | 40 | 2000 | 23–19 | 54.8% | #24 | 1,814 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2011 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #13 | 2,049 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2012 | 17–6 | 73.9% | #20 | 1,989 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1030 | 1,927 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1154 | 1,881 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |