H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kim Clijsters vs Flavia Pennetta H2H: 2-0
Kim Clijsters holds a 2–0 lead over Flavia Pennetta in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2010 Cincinnati quarterfinal 7-6(6) 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 44
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2010* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Kim Clijsters | 7-6(6) 6-4 | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
| Aug 15, 2005 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | QF | Hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-0 6-1 | Flavia Pennetta | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Clijsters | #1,140 | #1 | 8,895 | 2,275 | 463 | 127 | 78.5% | 4 | 7 | 3 | 21 | 6 | 41 |
| Flavia Pennetta | #15 | #6 | 3,621 | 1,982 | 418 | 272 | 60.6% | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 3 | 11 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Clijsters | Flavia Pennetta | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #46 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #18 | 1,911 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #5 | 2,030 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,143 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 86–12 | 87.8% | #2 | 2,260 | 0 | 19 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #95 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 18–4 | 81.8% | #22 | 2,188 | 0 | 21 | 2003 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #69 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 66–9 | 88.0% | #2 | 2,215 | 1 | 30 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #38 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2006 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,147 | 1 | 33 | 2005 | 37–21 | 63.8% | #23 | 1,777 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2007 | 14–4 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,113 | 1 | 34 | 2006 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #28 | 1,729 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #39 | 1,768 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–3 | 81.2% | #18 | 2,128 | 2 | 35 | 2008 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #13 | 1,900 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2010 | 39–7 | 84.8% | #3 | 2,182 | 3 | 40 | 2009 | 52–23 | 69.3% | #12 | 1,902 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | 2011 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #13 | 2,049 | 4 | 41 | 2010 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #24 | 1,847 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | 2012 | 17–6 | 73.9% | #20 | 1,989 | 4 | 41 | 2011 | 31–22 | 58.5% | #20 | 1,785 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #45 | 1,735 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #31 | 1,745 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 30–20 | 60.0% | #12 | 1,780 | 0 | 10 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 27–20 | 57.4% | #8 | 1,823 | 1 | 11 |
| 37 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1030 | 1,927 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1154 | 1,881 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |