H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Kim Clijsters vs Iva Majoli H2H: 1-0

Kim Clijsters holds a 1–0 lead over Iva Majoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Clijsters leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2002 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 16 6-1 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Clijsters
BEL Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Iva Majoli
CRO Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kim Clijsters #9 6-1 6-2 Iva Majoli #28 Match data Oct 11, 2002* R16 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kim Clijsters #1,140 #1 8,895 2,299 466 128 78.5% 4 7 3 18 9 41
Iva Majoli #777 #4 3,406 2,155 262 192 57.7% 1 3 0 4 0 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Clijsters Iva Majoli
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1992 7–6 53.8% #50 1,624 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1993 13–13 50.0% #46 1,735 0 0
16 1999 16–7 69.6% #46 1,724 0 1 1994 38–19 66.7% #13 1,921 0 0
17 2000 28–15 65.1% #18 1,913 0 3 1995 29–12 70.7% #9 2,045 0 2
18 2001 54–19 74.0% #5 2,036 0 6 1996 42–17 71.2% #7 2,038 0 4
19 2002 50–17 74.6% #4 2,146 0 10 1997 43–21 67.2% #6 1,946 1 7
20 2003 86–12 87.8% #2 2,261 0 19 1998 23–20 53.5% #25 1,828 1 7
21 2004 18–4 81.8% #22 2,246 0 21 1999 5–11 31.2% #164 1,694 1 7
22 2005 66–9 88.0% #2 2,234 1 30 2000 11–11 50.0% #62 1,695 1 7
23 2006 41–12 77.4% #5 2,165 1 33 2001 20–22 47.6% #44 1,697 1 7
24 2007 14–4 77.8% #5 2,128 1 34 2002 23–22 51.1% #32 1,667 1 8
25 — — — — — — — 2003 7–15 31.8% #131 1,606 1 8
26 2009 13–3 81.2% #18 2,140 2 35 2004 1–3 25.0% #321 1,579 1 8
27 2010 39–7 84.8% #3 2,189 3 40 — — — — — — —
28 2011 21–7 75.0% #13 2,054 4 41 — — — — — — —
29 2012 20–7 74.1% #20 2,022 4 41 — — — — — — —
37 2020 0–3 0.0% #1030 1,956 4 41 — — — — — — —
38 2021 0–2 0.0% #1154 1,908 4 41 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kim Clijsters Iva Majoli
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6%
16 1999 6 2 8 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1994 16 7 23 69.6% 13 5 18 72.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
17 2000 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 1995 14 3 17 82.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
18 2001 32 12 44 72.7% 11 5 16 68.8% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 0 4 100.0% 1996 10 6 16 62.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 4 19 78.9%
19 2002 37 11 48 77.1% 9 3 12 75.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1997 8 9 17 47.1% 19 4 23 82.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 12 6 18 66.7%
20 2003 57 7 64 89.1% 15 2 17 88.2% 9 1 10 90.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1998 6 5 11 54.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7%
21 2004 13 3 16 81.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 4 0 4 100.0% 1999 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0%
22 2005 50 5 55 90.9% 8 3 11 72.7% 8 1 9 88.9% — — — — 2000 5 5 10 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2006 24 8 32 75.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2001 11 11 22 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0%
24 2007 14 3 17 82.4% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 14 7 21 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0%
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 6 6 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2009 13 3 16 81.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2010 32 4 36 88.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 16 4 20 80.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 11 4 15 73.3% — — — — 9 3 12 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2020 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2021 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 322 80 402 80.1% 59 23 82 72.0% 54 17 71 76.1% 31 8 39 79.5% — 85 81 166 51.2% 105 58 163 64.4% 11 10 21 52.4% 61 43 104 58.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kim Clijsters Iva Majoli
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1624 131.4 — — — — -1 -35 — 50.0% -0.17 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -0.26
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1736 154.2 — — — — -24 -82 — 51.7% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.6 -0.69
16 1999 1725 145.5 — — — — -30 -155 -56 67.3% +1.53 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — -0.43 1994 1922 155.6 — — — — -47 -71 -318 58.8% +0.37 18–6 (75%) 10–2 (83%) 116.4 -1.10
17 2000 1913 156.2 — — — — +15 -370 -218 60.2% +0.62 11–8 (58%) 8–2 (80%) 107.4 -1.40 1995 2046 165.8 — — — — 0 -128 — 66.7% +1.21 8–6 (57%) 8–2 (80%) 107.5 -0.04
18 2001 2036 161.2 — — — — +15 -316 -171 69.3% +1.43 15–7 (68%) 7–2 (78%) 111.5 -0.33 1996 2038 166.9 — — — — +33 -42 -404 65.7% +0.63 13–8 (62%) 11–4 (73%) 105.7 -1.43
19 2002 2146 168.0 — — — — +28 -315 -318 69.1% +1.50 12–9 (57%) 5–6 (45%) 100.6 -1.80 1997 1946 159.5 — — — — -16 +184 -241 60.5% +0.66 20–9 (69%) 10–9 (53%) 106.3 +1.31
20 2003 2262 176.5 +7.01 +7.29 1.478 58.4% +19 -206 -246 83.9% +2.65 12–7 (63%) 5–1 (83%) 104.0 -2.52 1998 1829 148.6 — — — — -4 +251 — 52.7% 0.00 6–5 (55%) 7–4 (64%) 99.1 -0.16
21 2004 2247 155.4 +3.47 +3.81 1.426 57.9% +5 — — 90.2% +2.95 2–1 (67%) 4–0 (100%) 102.2 -0.05 1999 1694 121.9 — — — — +5 +287 — 35.1% -1.08 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.20
22 2005 2235 173.2 +5.59 +5.46 1.367 56.6% +51 -182 -131 85.4% +2.89 7–5 (58%) 4–5 (44%) 97.3 -0.64 2000 1695 114.9 — — — — -4 +192 — 42.3% -0.77 8–2 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.6 -0.36
23 2006 2166 165.9 +5.11 +5.07 1.249 54.5% +47 -71 -23 75.2% +1.82 9–4 (69%) 6–2 (75%) 101.0 -2.33 2001 1697 138.2 — — — — +23 +107 — 49.5% -0.19 6–7 (46%) 6–7 (46%) 98.7 -0.47
24 2007 2128 161.0 +4.97 +3.93 1.322 55.5% +66 — — 70.7% +1.95 4–1 (80%) 1–2 (33%) 99.6 +0.04 2002 1668 129.8 — — — — -45 +156 +61 51.9% -0.21 8–10 (44%) 6–4 (60%) 95.6 +0.77
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1607 113.3 -3.85 -1.53 0.641 40.0% -55 +133 — 35.3% -1.04 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 96.9 -0.94
26 2009 2141 159.8 +6.04 +5.04 1.334 55.9% +56 — — 73.7% +1.87 4–2 (67%) 0–1 — -1.42 2004 1579 102.6 — — — — -48 — — 33.3% -0.56 0–1 — — -0.23
27 2010 2190 168.6 +6.21 +7.25 1.348 56.4% +54 — -96 76.2% +2.15 11–4 (73%) 6–4 (60%) 103.3 -2.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2011 2055 151.4 +3.98 +4.33 1.252 54.8% +97 — — 72.9% +1.73 6–1 (86%) 6–2 (75%) 101.4 +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2012 2023 145.0 +6.00 +3.05 1.314 55.0% +75 — +54 73.6% +1.85 4–1 (80%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 -0.72 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2020 1956 116.1 +0.27 +0.94 0.751 45.5% +63 — — 14.3% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.43 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2021 1908 106.1 +0.32 -1.68 0.864 46.7% — — — 33.3% -1.50 0–2 — — -0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2299 172.4 +5.39 +5.26 1.313 55.7% +36 -226 -114 74.6% +1.92 99–56 (64%) 55–34 (62%) 106.7 -2.42 — 2155 156.1 -3.85 -1.53 0.641 40.0% -9 +79 -234 55.0% +0.17 99–66 (60%) 62–43 (59%) 109.1 -0.75

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.