H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kim Clijsters vs Jelena Dokic H2H: 7-2

Kim Clijsters holds a 7–2 lead over Jelena Dokic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Kim Clijsters leads 3–0 on carpet. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2011 Paris quarterfinal 6-3 6-0.

BEL Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
7 2
9 main draw meetings
AUS Age 43 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 12, 2011* Paris WTA 500 QF Carpet Kim Clijsters #2 6-3 6-0 Jelena Dokic #120 Match data
Oct 18, 2003* Zurich WTA 1000 SF Hard Jelena Dokic #25 1-6 6-3 6-4 Kim Clijsters #1 Match data
Sep 26, 2003* Leipzig WTA 500 R16 Carpet Kim Clijsters #1 6-3 6-4 Jelena Dokic #26 Match data
Mar 24, 2003* Miami WTA 1000 QF Hard Kim Clijsters #3 6-2 6-0 Jelena Dokic #9 Match data
Sep 21, 2002* Tokyo WTA 500 SF Hard Kim Clijsters #8 5-7 6-2 6-3 Jelena Dokic #4 Match data
May 5, 2002* Hamburg WTA 500 SF Clay Kim Clijsters #3 6-4 4-4 (ret.) Jelena Dokic #9 Match data
Sep 22, 2001* Tokyo WTA 500 SF Hard Jelena Dokic #11 7-5 6-4 Kim Clijsters #5 Match data
Jun 18, 2001 S Hertogenbosch WTA 250 SF Grass Kim Clijsters #7 6-4 6-2 Jelena Dokic #16 Match data
Nov 4, 2000* Leipzig WTA 500 QF Carpet Kim Clijsters #31 4-6 6-2 7-6(4) Jelena Dokic #28 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kim Clijsters #1,140 #1 8,895 2,275 463 127 78.5% 4 7 3 21 6 41
Jelena Dokic #945 #4 3,338 2,031 208 175 54.3% 0 2 0 1 3 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Clijsters Jelena Dokic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1998 0–1 0.0% #349 1,497 0 0
16 1999 16–7 69.6% #46 1,724 0 1 1999 11–10 52.4% #43 1,629 0 0
17 2000 28–15 65.1% #18 1,911 0 3 2000 28–19 59.6% #24 1,769 0 0
18 2001 54–19 74.0% #5 2,030 0 6 2001 53–23 69.7% #8 1,999 0 3
19 2002 50–17 74.6% #4 2,143 0 10 2002 53–27 66.2% #9 1,897 0 5
20 2003 86–12 87.8% #2 2,260 0 19 2003 28–30 48.3% #15 1,778 0 5
21 2004 18–4 81.8% #22 2,188 0 21 2004 7–16 30.4% #124 1,582 0 5
22 2005 66–9 88.0% #2 2,215 1 30 2005 2–5 28.6% #349 1,525 0 5
23 2006 41–12 77.4% #5 2,147 1 33 2006 0–2 0.0% #587 1,499 0 5
24 2007 14–4 77.8% #5 2,113 1 34
25 2008 1–3 25.0% #179 1,480 0 5
26 2009 13–3 81.2% #18 2,128 2 35 2009 6–9 40.0% #56 1,527 0 5
27 2010 39–7 84.8% #3 2,182 3 40 2010 1–5 16.7% #138 1,513 0 5
28 2011 21–7 75.0% #13 2,049 4 41 2011 15–16 48.4% #66 1,592 0 6
29 2012 17–6 73.9% #20 1,989 4 41 2012 3–9 25.0% #258 1,516 0 6
37 2020 0–3 0.0% #1030 1,927 4 41
38 2021 0–2 0.0% #1154 1,881 4 41