H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Kim Clijsters vs Jelena Kostanic Tosic H2H: 1-0
Kim Clijsters holds a 1–0 lead over Jelena Kostanic Tosic in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kim Clijsters leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2005 Antwerp third round 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 45
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2005* | Antwerp | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-2 6-3 | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Clijsters | #1,140 | #1 | 8,895 | 2,275 | 463 | 127 | 78.5% | 4 | 7 | 3 | 21 | 6 | 41 |
| Jelena Kostanic Tosic | #937 | #32 | 900 | 1,726 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Clijsters | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #46 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #18 | 1,911 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #5 | 2,030 | 0 | 6 | 2000 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #114 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,143 | 0 | 10 | 2001 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 86–12 | 87.8% | #2 | 2,260 | 0 | 19 | 2002 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #70 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 18–4 | 81.8% | #22 | 2,188 | 0 | 21 | 2003 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 66–9 | 88.0% | #2 | 2,215 | 1 | 30 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2006 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,147 | 1 | 33 | 2005 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #87 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 14–4 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,113 | 1 | 34 | 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #103 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–3 | 81.2% | #18 | 2,128 | 2 | 35 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #114 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 39–7 | 84.8% | #3 | 2,182 | 3 | 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2011 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #13 | 2,049 | 4 | 41 | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2012 | 17–6 | 73.9% | #20 | 1,989 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1030 | 1,927 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1154 | 1,881 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |