H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Kim Clijsters vs Jill Craybas H2H: 0-1
Jill Craybas holds a 1–0 lead over Kim Clijsters in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jill Craybas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jill Craybas won the 2006 Miami second round 7-5 3-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 52
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2006* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Jill Craybas | 7-5 3-6 7-5 | Kim Clijsters | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Clijsters | #1,140 | #1 | 8,895 | 2,275 | 463 | 127 | 78.5% | 4 | 7 | 3 | 21 | 6 | 41 |
| Jill Craybas | #336 | #39 | 974 | 1,695 | 161 | 256 | 38.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Clijsters | Jill Craybas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #46 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #18 | 1,911 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2001 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #5 | 2,030 | 0 | 6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2002 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,143 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2003 | 86–12 | 87.8% | #2 | 2,260 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2004 | 18–4 | 81.8% | #22 | 2,188 | 0 | 21 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2005 | 66–9 | 88.0% | #2 | 2,215 | 1 | 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2006 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,147 | 1 | 33 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #154 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2007 | 14–4 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,113 | 1 | 34 | 1999 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #145 | 1,449 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–3 | 81.2% | #18 | 2,128 | 2 | 35 | 2001 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #98 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2010 | 39–7 | 84.8% | #3 | 2,182 | 3 | 40 | 2002 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #57 | 1,652 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2011 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #13 | 2,049 | 4 | 41 | 2003 | 16–22 | 42.1% | #99 | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2012 | 17–6 | 73.9% | #20 | 1,989 | 4 | 41 | 2004 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #59 | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #48 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 18–25 | 41.9% | #70 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 12–27 | 30.8% | #79 | 1,472 | 0 | 1 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #64 | 1,575 | 0 | 1 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #76 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 12–23 | 34.3% | #98 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 6–20 | 23.1% | #150 | 1,442 | 0 | 1 |
| 37 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1030 | 1,927 | 4 | 41 | 2012 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #189 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 |
| 38 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1154 | 1,881 | 4 | 41 | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #336 | 1,451 | 0 | 1 |