H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kim Clijsters vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 9-8

Kim Clijsters holds a 9–8 lead over Lindsay Davenport in their WTA head-to-head. Across 17 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 9–5 on hard courts, while Lindsay Davenport leads 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2005 Wimbledon fourth round 6-3 6-7(4) 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Kim Clijsters
BEL Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
9 – 8
17 main draw meetings
Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 28, 2005* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Lindsay Davenport #1 6-3 6-7(4) 6-3 Kim Clijsters #13 Match data
May 31, 2005* Roland Garros Grand Slam R16 Clay Lindsay Davenport #1 1-6 7-5 6-3 Kim Clijsters #17 Match data
Mar 15, 2005* Indian Wells WTA 1000 F Hard Kim Clijsters #133 6-4 4-6 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #1 Match data
Sep 6, 2003* US Open Grand Slam SF Hard Kim Clijsters #1 6-2 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #4 Match data
Aug 10, 2003* Los Angeles WTA 500 F Hard Kim Clijsters #2 6-1 3-6 6-1 Lindsay Davenport #4 Match data
Aug 2, 2003* San Diego WTA 500 SF Hard Kim Clijsters #2 6-3 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #5 Match data
Mar 11, 2003* Indian Wells WTA 1000 F Hard Kim Clijsters #3 6-4 7-5 Lindsay Davenport #7 Match data
Jan 12, 2003* Sydney WTA 500 F Hard Kim Clijsters #4 6-4 6-3 Lindsay Davenport #12 Match data
Oct 19, 2002* Zurich WTA 1000 QF Hard Lindsay Davenport #10 6-3 7-6(5) Kim Clijsters #5 Match data
Oct 12, 2002* Filderstadt WTA 500 QF Hard Kim Clijsters #9 4-6 6-3 6-4 Lindsay Davenport #7 Match data
Jul 27, 2002* Stanford WTA 500 SF Hard Kim Clijsters #5 4-6 6-4 6-2 Lindsay Davenport #9 Match data
Nov 6, 2001* WTA Tour Championships WTA Finals SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 1-6 6-3 7-6(3) Kim Clijsters #5 Match data
Aug 24, 2001* New Haven WTA 500 SF Hard Lindsay Davenport #3 (w/o) Kim Clijsters #5 Match data
Jul 29, 2001* Stanford WTA 500 F Hard Kim Clijsters #6 6-4 6-7(5) 6-1 Lindsay Davenport #4 Match data
Jul 6, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Lindsay Davenport #3 6-1 6-2 Kim Clijsters #7 Match data
Jan 24, 2001* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 6-4 6-0 Kim Clijsters #17 Match data
Aug 22, 2000 US Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Lindsay Davenport #2 4-6 6-2 6-2 Kim Clijsters #33 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kim Clijsters #1,140 #1 8,895 2,275 463 127 78.5% 4 7 3 21 6 41
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Clijsters Lindsay Davenport
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 1999 16–7 69.6% #46 1,724 0 1 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0
17 2000 28–15 65.1% #18 1,911 0 3 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1
18 2001 54–19 74.0% #5 2,030 0 6 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3
19 2002 50–17 74.6% #4 2,143 0 10 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4
20 2003 86–12 87.8% #2 2,260 0 19 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6
21 2004 18–4 81.8% #22 2,188 0 21 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12
22 2005 66–9 88.0% #2 2,215 1 30 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18
23 2006 41–12 77.4% #5 2,147 1 33 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25
24 2007 14–4 77.8% #5 2,113 1 34 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29
25 — — — — — — — 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36
26 2009 13–3 81.2% #18 2,128 2 35 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36
27 2010 39–7 84.8% #3 2,182 3 40 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37
28 2011 21–7 75.0% #13 2,049 4 41 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44
29 2012 17–6 73.9% #20 1,989 4 41 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 — — — — — — — 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 — — — — — — — 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 — — — — — — — 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54
37 2020 0–3 0.0% #1030 1,927 4 41 — — — — — — —
38 2021 0–2 0.0% #1154 1,881 4 41 — — — — — — —