H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kim Clijsters vs Marion Bartoli H2H: 3-1
Kim Clijsters holds a 3–1 lead over Marion Bartoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 3–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Marion Bartoli won the 2011 Indian Wells fourth round 3-6 3-1 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 43
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2011* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Marion Bartoli | 3-6 3-1 (ret.) | Kim Clijsters | Match data |
| Sep 3, 2009* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Kim Clijsters | 5-7 6-1 6-2 | Marion Bartoli | Match data |
| Aug 12, 2009* | Cincinnati | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-4 6-3 | Marion Bartoli | Match data |
| Aug 1, 2003* | San Diego | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Kim Clijsters | 6-1 6-1 | Marion Bartoli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Clijsters | #1,140 | #1 | 8,895 | 2,275 | 463 | 127 | 78.5% | 4 | 7 | 3 | 21 | 6 | 41 |
| Marion Bartoli | #13 | #7 | 5,160 | 1,996 | 402 | 267 | 60.1% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Kim Clijsters | Marion Bartoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1999 | 16–7 | 69.6% | #46 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2000 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #18 | 1,911 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2001 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #5 | 2,030 | 0 | 6 | 2003 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2002 | 50–17 | 74.6% | #4 | 2,143 | 0 | 10 | 2004 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #41 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2003 | 86–12 | 87.8% | #2 | 2,260 | 0 | 19 | 2005 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2004 | 18–4 | 81.8% | #22 | 2,188 | 0 | 21 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #18 | 1,800 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2005 | 66–9 | 88.0% | #2 | 2,215 | 1 | 30 | 2007 | 47–31 | 60.3% | #10 | 1,873 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2006 | 41–12 | 77.4% | #5 | 2,147 | 1 | 33 | 2008 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #17 | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2007 | 14–4 | 77.8% | #5 | 2,113 | 1 | 34 | 2009 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #11 | 1,882 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,820 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2009 | 13–3 | 81.2% | #18 | 2,128 | 2 | 35 | 2011 | 60–26 | 69.8% | #9 | 1,907 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2010 | 39–7 | 84.8% | #3 | 2,182 | 3 | 40 | 2012 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #11 | 1,814 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2011 | 21–7 | 75.0% | #13 | 2,049 | 4 | 41 | 2013 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #13 | 1,808 | 1 | 8 |
| 29 | 2012 | 17–6 | 73.9% | #20 | 1,989 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 37 | 2020 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #1030 | 1,927 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 38 | 2021 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #1154 | 1,881 | 4 | 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |