H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC

Kim Clijsters vs Martina Hingis H2H: 5-4

Kim Clijsters holds a 5–4 lead over Martina Hingis in their WTA head-to-head. Across 9 main-draw meetings, they are tied 4–4 on hard courts, while Kim Clijsters leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2007 Australian Open quarterfinal 3-6 6-4 6-3.

BEL Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 4
9 main draw meetings
SUI Age 45 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 25, 2007* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Kim Clijsters #5 3-6 6-4 6-3 Martina Hingis #7 Match data
Aug 5, 2006* San Diego WTA 1000 QF Hard Kim Clijsters #2 7-5 6-2 Martina Hingis #13 Match data
Jun 7, 2006* Roland Garros Grand Slam QF Clay Kim Clijsters #2 7-6(5) 6-1 Martina Hingis #15 Match data
Jan 26, 2006* Australian Open Grand Slam QF Hard Kim Clijsters #2 6-3 2-6 6-4 Martina Hingis #349 Match data
Jan 11, 2002* Sydney WTA 500 SF Hard Martina Hingis #4 7-5 4-6 6-2 Kim Clijsters #5 Match data
Mar 13, 2001* Indian Wells WTA 1000 SF Hard Kim Clijsters #19 6-2 2-6 6-1 Martina Hingis #1 Match data
Jan 11, 2001* Sydney WTA 500 R16 Hard Martina Hingis #1 6-4 6-4 Kim Clijsters #18 Match data
Oct 8, 2000* Filderstadt WTA 500 F Hard Martina Hingis #1 6-0 6-3 Kim Clijsters #45 Match data
Mar 24, 2000* Miami WTA 1000 R16 Hard Martina Hingis #1 6-0 6-4 Kim Clijsters #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kim Clijsters #1,140 #1 8,895 2,275 463 127 78.5% 4 7 3 21 6 41
Martina Hingis #19 #1 6,976 2,385 515 126 80.3% 5 18 2 10 8 43

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Clijsters Martina Hingis
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1994 5–3 62.5% #87 1,595 0 0
14 1995 18–12 60.0% #16 1,826 0 0
15 1996 45–15 75.0% #6 2,160 0 2
16 1999 16–7 69.6% #46 1,724 0 1 1997 72–5 93.5% #1 2,321 3 14
17 2000 28–15 65.1% #18 1,911 0 3 1998 60–12 83.3% #2 2,264 4 19
18 2001 54–19 74.0% #5 2,030 0 6 1999 70–12 85.4% #1 2,285 5 26
19 2002 50–17 74.6% #4 2,143 0 10 2000 78–10 88.6% #1 2,314 5 35
20 2003 86–12 87.8% #2 2,260 0 19 2001 60–15 80.0% #4 2,123 5 38
21 2004 18–4 81.8% #22 2,188 0 21 2002 34–10 77.3% #10 2,050 5 40
22 2005 66–9 88.0% #2 2,215 1 30
23 2006 41–12 77.4% #5 2,147 1 33
24 2007 14–4 77.8% #5 2,113 1 34 2005 0–1 0.0% 2,020 5 40
25 2006 53–19 73.6% #7 2,013 5 42
26 2009 13–3 81.2% #18 2,128 2 35 2007 20–12 62.5% #19 1,855 5 43
27 2010 39–7 84.8% #3 2,182 3 40
28 2011 21–7 75.0% #13 2,049 4 41
29 2012 17–6 73.9% #20 1,989 4 41
37 2020 0–3 0.0% #1030 1,927 4 41
38 2021 0–2 0.0% #1154 1,881 4 41