H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Kim Clijsters vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 5-2

Kim Clijsters holds a 5–2 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 4–2 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kim Clijsters won the 2009 Luxembourg third round 6-2 6-2.

BEL Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 2
7 main draw meetings
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 22, 2009* Luxembourg WTA 250 R32 Hard Kim Clijsters #18 6-2 6-2 Meghann Shaughnessy #544 Match data
Sep 2, 2003* US Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Kim Clijsters #1 6-2 6-4 Meghann Shaughnessy #21 Match data
Mar 1, 2003* Scottsdale WTA 500 SF Hard Kim Clijsters #3 6-3 7-5 Meghann Shaughnessy #27 Match data
Jul 28, 2001* Stanford WTA 500 SF Hard Kim Clijsters #6 6-3 2-6 6-1 Meghann Shaughnessy #15 Match data
Jul 4, 2001* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Kim Clijsters #7 7-6(2) 7-6(5) Meghann Shaughnessy #18 Match data
Mar 3, 2001* Scottsdale WTA 500 QF Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #27 6-2 6-4 Kim Clijsters #19 Match data
Jul 27, 2000* Stanford WTA 500 R32 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #54 3-6 7-6(4) 6-3 Kim Clijsters #34 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kim Clijsters #1,140 #1 8,895 2,275 463 127 78.5% 4 7 3 21 6 41
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,888 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Clijsters Meghann Shaughnessy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 16–7 69.6% #46 1,724 0 1
17 2000 28–15 65.1% #18 1,911 0 3 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,512 0 0
18 2001 54–19 74.0% #5 2,030 0 6 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0
19 2002 50–17 74.6% #4 2,143 0 10 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0
20 2003 86–12 87.8% #2 2,260 0 19 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,439 0 0
21 2004 18–4 81.8% #22 2,188 0 21 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,652 0 1
22 2005 66–9 88.0% #2 2,215 1 30 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,825 0 2
23 2006 41–12 77.4% #5 2,147 1 33 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,716 0 2
24 2007 14–4 77.8% #5 2,113 1 34 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,725 0 3
25 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,663 0 3
26 2009 13–3 81.2% #18 2,128 2 35 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,563 0 3
27 2010 39–7 84.8% #3 2,182 3 40 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5
28 2011 21–7 75.0% #13 2,049 4 41 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6
29 2012 17–6 73.9% #20 1,989 4 41 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6
30 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6
37 2020 0–3 0.0% #1030 1,927 4 41
38 2021 0–2 0.0% #1154 1,881 4 41