H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Kim Clijsters vs Nadia Petrova H2H: 4-1

Kim Clijsters holds a 4–1 lead over Nadia Petrova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Kim Clijsters leads 2–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nadia Petrova won the 2010 Australian Open third round 6-0 6-1.

BEL Age 43 Right-Handed 174 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4 1
5 main draw meetings
RUS Age 44 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 23, 2010* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Nadia Petrova #19 6-0 6-1 Kim Clijsters #15 Match data
Aug 13, 2005* Los Angeles WTA 500 QF Hard Kim Clijsters #10 6-4 6-2 Nadia Petrova #9 Match data
Feb 18, 2005* Antwerp WTA 500 R16 Hard Kim Clijsters #87 7-5 6-7(3) 6-1 Nadia Petrova #12 Match data
Jun 7, 2003* Roland Garros Grand Slam SF Clay Kim Clijsters #2 7-5 6-1 Nadia Petrova #76 Match data
Sep 27, 2002* Leipzig WTA 500 R16 Carpet Kim Clijsters #8 6-4 6-2 Nadia Petrova #169 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Kim Clijsters #1,140 #1 8,895 2,275 463 127 78.5% 4 7 3 21 6 41
Nadia Petrova #578 #3 3,882 2,077 441 276 61.5% 0 3 1 7 2 13

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kim Clijsters Nadia Petrova
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1999 16–7 69.6% #46 1,724 0 1 1998 2–2 50.0% #145 1,536 0 0
17 2000 28–15 65.1% #18 1,911 0 3 1999 3–5 37.5% #93 1,568 0 0
18 2001 54–19 74.0% #5 2,030 0 6 2000 12–15 44.4% #60 1,624 0 0
19 2002 50–17 74.6% #4 2,143 0 10 2001 20–21 48.8% #39 1,682 0 0
20 2003 86–12 87.8% #2 2,260 0 19 2002 7–5 58.3% #112 1,758 0 0
21 2004 18–4 81.8% #22 2,188 0 21 2003 36–20 64.3% #12 1,924 0 0
22 2005 66–9 88.0% #2 2,215 1 30 2004 39–24 61.9% #12 1,880 0 0
23 2006 41–12 77.4% #5 2,147 1 33 2005 56–25 69.1% #9 1,945 0 1
24 2007 14–4 77.8% #5 2,113 1 34 2006 48–19 71.6% #6 1,990 0 6
25 2007 37–18 67.3% #14 1,931 0 7
26 2009 13–3 81.2% #18 2,128 2 35 2008 47–24 66.2% #11 1,923 0 9
27 2010 39–7 84.8% #3 2,182 3 40 2009 30–21 58.8% #20 1,821 0 9
28 2011 21–7 75.0% #13 2,049 4 41 2010 32–20 61.5% #15 1,828 0 9
29 2012 17–6 73.9% #20 1,989 4 41 2011 25–21 54.3% #29 1,781 0 10
30 2012 37–18 67.3% #12 1,917 0 13
31 2013 9–13 40.9% #104 1,718 0 13
32 2014 1–5 16.7% #362 1,648 0 13
37 2020 0–3 0.0% #1030 1,927 4 41
38 2021 0–2 0.0% #1154 1,881 4 41